The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preservation of the Inner Retina in Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Morphometric Analysis
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent of preservation in the inner retina in retinitis pigmentosa (RP). METHODS: We analyzed sectioned maculae of 21 postmortem eyes with RP and 19 age-matched, normal, postmortem eyes. Eyes were divided into 2 groups: severe and moderate RP. Cell nuclei were counted in the outer nuclear, inner nuclear, and ganglion cell layers within thirty 100-microns intervals from the foveola to 1500-microns eccentricity. RESULTS: Statistically significant (P < or = .05) loss of both the outer nuclear and ganglion cell layers was present in the groups with moderate and severe RP when compared with the control groups. However, even in the group with severe RP, 30% of the ganglion cells were histologically intact. Similarly, 78% and 88% of the inner nuclear layer cells were preserved in the groups with severe and moderate RP, respectively. Different inheritance modes showed no statistically significant differences in any of the retinal layers. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a statistically significant (P < or = .05) loss of cells found in all retinal layers, a large percentage of the inner retinal neurons remained histologically intact. Current experimental therapies, such as photoreceptor transplantation and implantation of a visual prosthesis, are based on the premise that some inner retinal neurons are preserved after death of photoreceptors in RP. Our observations support this assumption.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Retinal photoreceptor density decreases with age
Panda-Jonas, S., Jonas, J. B., & Jakobczyk-Zmija, M. (1995) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30784-1 · Cited by 208
Cited by
Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis
Humayun, M. S., Weiland, J. D., Fujii, G. Y., Greenberg, R., Williamson, R., Little, J., Mech, B., Cimmarusti, V., Van Boemel, G., Dagnelie, G., et al. (2003) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(03)00457-7 · Cited by 856
Rizzo, J. F., Wyatt, J., Loewenstein, J., Kelly, S., & Shire, D. (2003) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.02-0817 · Cited by 478
Retinal remodeling triggered by photoreceptor degenerations
Jones, B. W., Watt, C. B., Frederick, J. M., Baehr, W., Chen, C., Levine, E. M., Milam, A. H., Lavail, M. M., & Marc, R. E. (2003) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.10703 · Cited by 476
Subretinal visual implant alpha IMS - clinical trial interim report
Stingl, K., Bartz-Schmidt, K. U., Besch, D., Chee, C. K., Cottriall, C. L., Gekeler, F., Groppe, M., Jackson, T. L., MacLaren, R. E., Koitschev, A., et al. (2015) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2015.03.001 · Cited by 387
Weiland, J. D., Liu, W., & Humayun, M. S. (2005) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.7.060804.100435 · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Santos, A.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1997-04-01
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 511
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070162220
- Cited by
- 643
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preservation of the Inner Retina in Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Morphometric Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150513011
- The paper
- Santos, A. (1997). Preservation of the Inner Retina in Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Morphometric Analysis. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150513011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.