The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Alterations of Tear Neuromediators in Dry Eye Disease
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate tear levels of neuromediators in patients with dry eye disease and to identify statistical correlations with the clinical findings. METHODS: Nineteen patients with dry eye disease (Sjögren syndrome, n = 5 patients; non-Sjögren syndrome, n = 10; and ocular cicatricial pemphigoid, n = 4) and 12 healthy volunteers were enrolled. The eyes of all participants were evaluated by slitlamp examination, Schirmer testing, fluorescein staining, and tear film break-up time. Grading of dry eye severity was recorded. Tear samples were collected, and substance P, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), neuropeptide Y (NPY), vasoactive intestinal peptide, and nerve growth factor (NGF) concentrations were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunoassay and correlated with the clinical findings. RESULTS: Nerve growth factor tear levels were significantly increased in participants with dry eye disease; CGRP and NPY concentrations were significantly decreased when compared with those in healthy participants. Dry eye severity showed a direct correlation with NGF and an inverse correlation with CGRP and NPY tear levels. Nerve growth factor tear levels showed a direct correlation with conjunctival hyperemia and fluorescein staining results, CGRP directly correlated with Schirmer test values, and NPY inversely correlated with tear film break-up time. Subgroup analysis showed that CGRP and NPY but not NGF were changed in autoimmune (ie, Sjögren syndrome and ocular cicatricial pemphigoid) dry eye disease. CONCLUSIONS: The decreased tear levels of NPY and CGRP in dry eye disease are related to impaired lacrimal function, and tear levels of NGF are more closely related to corneal epithelial damage. Our findings suggest that NPY, CGRP, and NGF could become useful markers of dry eye severity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
TFOS DEWS II Management and Therapy Report
Jones, L., Downie, L. E., Korb, D., Benitez-del-Castillo, J. M., Dana, R., Deng, S. X., Dong, P. N., Geerling, G., Hida, R. Y., Liu, Y., et al. (2017) · The Ocular Surface · doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.006 · Cited by 1,422
Dry Eye as a Mucosal Autoimmune Disease
Stern, M. E., Schaumburg, C. S., & Pflugfelder, S. C. (2013) · International Reviews of Immunology · doi:10.3109/08830185.2012.748052 · Cited by 346
Associations between signs and symptoms of dry eye disease: a systematic review
Bartlett, J., Keith, M., Sudharshan, L., & Snedecor, S. (2015) · Clinical Ophthalmology · doi:10.2147/opth.s89700 · Cited by 268
Neurotrophin receptor agonists and antagonists as therapeutic agents: An evolving paradigm
Josephy-Hernandez, S., Jmaeff, S., Pirvulescu, I., Aboulkassim, T., & Saragovi, H. U. (2017) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2016.08.004 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Lambiase, A.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2011-08-01
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 981
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2108414140
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alterations of Tear Neuromediators in Dry Eye Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.200
- The paper
- Lambiase, A. (2011). Alterations of Tear Neuromediators in Dry Eye Disease. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.