Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 389

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A 2-Year Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravitreal Bevacizumab or Laser Therapy (BOLT) in the Management of Diabetic Macular Edema: 24-Month Data: Report 3

Rajendram, Ranjan, Fraser-Bell, Samantha, Kaines, Andrew, Michaelides, Michel, Hamilton, Robin D., Esposti, Simona Degli, Peto, Tunde, Egan, Catherine, Bunce, Catey, Leslie, Richard David, Hykin, Philip G.·2012·Archives of Ophthalmology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the 2-year outcomes of the BOLT study, a prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating intravitreous bevacizumab and modified Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) macular laser therapy (MLT) in patients with persistent clinically significant macular edema (CSME). METHODS: In a 2-year, single-center, randomized controlled trial, 80 patients with center-involving CSME and visual acuity of 20/40 to 20/320 were randomized to receive either bevacizumab or MLT. PRIMARY OUTCOME: difference in ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between arms. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: mean change in BCVA, proportion gaining at least 15 and at least 10 ETDRS letters, losing fewer than 15 and at least 30 letters, change in central macular thickness, ETDRS retinopathy severity, and safety outcomes. RESULTS: At 2 years, mean (SD) ETDRS BCVA was 64.4 (13.3) (ETDRS equivalent Snellen fraction: 20/50) in the bevacizumab arm and 54.8 (12.6) (20/80) in the MLT arm (P=.005). The bevacizumab arm gained a median of 9 ETDRS letters vs 2.5 letters for MLT (P=.005), with a mean gain of 8.6 letters for bevacizumab vs amean loss of 0.5 letters for MLT. Forty-nine percent of patients gained 10 or more letters (P=.001) and 32% gained at least 15 letters (P=.004) for bevacizumab vs 7% and 4% for MLT. Percentage who lost fewer than 15 letters in the MLT arm was 86% vs 100% for bevacizumab (P=.03). Mean reduction in central macular thickness was 146 μm in the bevacizumab arm vs 118 μm in the MLT arm. The median number of treatments over 24 months was 13 for bevacizumab and 4 for MLT. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence supporting longer-term use of intravitreous bevacizumab for persistent center-involving CSME. APPLICATION TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Improvements in BCVA and central macular thickness seen with bevacizumab at 1 year were maintained over the second year with a mean of 4 injections. TRIAL REGISTRATION: eudract.ema.europa.eu Identifier: 2007-000847-89

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.393

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 389

Metadata

Authors
Rajendram, R., Fraser-Bell, S., Kaines, A., Michaelides, M., Hamilton, R. D., Esposti, S. D., Peto, T., Egan, C., Bunce, C., Leslie, R. D., & Hykin, P. G.
Venue
Archives of Ophthalmology
Published
2012-08-01
Volume
130
Issue
8
Pages
972-9
ISSN
0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010599103
Cited by
389
References
2
FWCI
35.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A 2-Year Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravitreal Bevacizumab or Laser Therapy (BOLT) in the Management of Diabetic Macular Edema: 24-Month Data: Report 3. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.393
The paper
Rajendram, R., Fraser-Bell, S., Kaines, A., Michaelides, M., Hamilton, R. D., Esposti, S. D., Peto, T., Egan, C., Bunce, C., Leslie, R. D., & Hykin, P. G. (2012). A 2-Year Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravitreal Bevacizumab or Laser Therapy (BOLT) in the Management of Diabetic Macular Edema: 24-Month Data: Report 3. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.393

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.