Cited by 112Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal Imaging and AnalysisRetinal and Macular Surgery

Diabetic retinopathy management guidelines

Chakrabarti, Rahul, Harper, C Alex, Keeffe, Jill Elizabeth·2012·Expert Review of Ophthalmology

Abstract

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is an important cause of avoidable blindness worldwide. Seventy percent of diabetes occur in low and lower-middle income countries. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of DR have been implemented throughout the world, but mainly in developed nations. However, there is considerable variation between existing guidelines in the recommended frequency of referral, methods for examination and personnel involved in screening and review. This review compares the differences between current available guidelines in the context of the current medical evidence and also addresses the implications for management of DR in countries with limited resources.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1586/eop.12.52

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chakrabarti, R., Harper, C. A., & Keeffe, J. E.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
Expert Review of Ophthalmology
Published
2012-10
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
417-439
ISSN
  • 1746-9899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1746-9902
OpenAlex
W1984639731
Cited by
112
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Expert Review of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal and Macular Surgery
Keywords
diabetic retinopathy, guideline comparison, blindness prevention, diabetes mellitus, low- and middle-income countries, retinal screening, screening frequency, resource-limited settings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review