Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The 5-Year Incidence and Progression of Hearing Loss: The Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study

Cruickshanks, Karen J., Tweed, Ted S., Wiley, Terry L., Klein, Barbara E. K., Klein, Ronald, Chappell, Rick, Nondahl, David M., Dalton, Dayna S.·2003·Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery

Abstract

CONTEXT: Hearing impairment affects many older adults, but the incidence is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the 5-year incidence and progression of hearing impairment. DESIGN: A longitudinal, population-based study of adults aged 48 to 92 years at baseline examination. Hearing sensitivity was measured twice, 5 years apart. SETTING: Testing was conducted at the Beaver Dam Community Hospital, Beaver Dam, Wis. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1636 participants without hearing loss and 1085 participants with hearing loss at the baseline examination in 1993-1995 were reexamined in 1998-2000. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The examinations included otoscopy, screening tympanometry, and tone air- and bone-conduction audiometry. Incidence of hearing impairment was defined as a pure-tone average (PTA) of thresholds at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz (PTA 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) greater than 25 dB HL (hearing level) in either ear at follow-up among those without hearing loss at baseline. Progression was defined as a change of more than 5 dB in the PTA 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz among those with hearing loss at baseline. RESULTS: The 5-year incidence of hearing impairment was 21%. More than half of those with hearing loss at baseline experienced a decline in hearing. Age was an important risk factor for both incidence and progression. Male sex, occupation, and education were associated with the incidence of hearing loss after adjusting for age. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults have a high risk of developing hearing loss. Among those with hearing loss, most experience further declines in hearing sensitivity over time. These data indicate that hearing impairment is an important public health problem and underscore the need for appropriate hearing screening and treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archotol.129.10.1041

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 317

Metadata

Authors
Cruickshanks, K. J., Tweed, T. S., Wiley, T. L., Klein, B. E. K., Klein, R., Chappell, R., Nondahl, D. M., & Dalton, D. S.
Venue
Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery
Published
2003-10-01
Volume
129
Issue
10
Pages
1041
ISSN
0886-4470 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2138902509
Cited by
317
References
21
FWCI
3.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The 5-Year Incidence and Progression of Hearing Loss: The Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archotol.129.10.1041
The paper
Cruickshanks, K. J., Tweed, T. S., Wiley, T. L., Klein, B. E. K., Klein, R., Chappell, R., Nondahl, D. M., & Dalton, D. S. (2003). The 5-Year Incidence and Progression of Hearing Loss: The Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.129.10.1041

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.