Cited by 20Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular TechniquesCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies

Replanting the severed auricle. An update

Bernstein, L., Nelson, R. H.·1982·Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Abstract

An updated method of replanting a severed auricle is reported. Management consists of early, meticulous replantation with minimal debridement; cooling of the auricle; low-dose heparin sodium; dextran 40; antibiotic coverage; and multiple stab incisions to relieve venous congestion. The regimen is based on experience with nine successfully replanted auricles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archotol.1982.00790570053013

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bernstein, L., & Nelson, R. H.
Venue
Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Published
1982-09-01
Volume
108
Issue
9
Pages
587-590
ISSN
0886-4470 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023922540
Cited by
20
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Keywords
ear trauma, microsurgical replantation, heparin, dextran 40, antibiotic prophylaxis, venous congestion
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Bites and Stings, Dogs, Ear, External, Female, Humans, Postoperative Care, Replantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review