The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Culture-Positive Allergic Fungal Sinusitis
Abstract
Allergic Aspergillus sinusitis is a well-defined clinical and histologic entity, although surprisingly few reported cases have yielded any fungal growth on culture. Taking advantage of recent changes in the identification and classification of certain groups of fungi, we were able to identify a specific fungal organism in 19 of 22 consecutive patients with a histologic diagnosis of allergic fungal sinusitis over the past 2 1/2 years. Aspergillus was found in only one patient, while an organism in the family of dematiaceous fungi was found in 18 patients. Of these patients, the genus Bipolaris was the most commonly represented, while Exserohilum, Curvularia, and Alternaria species were seen with less frequency. Thus, it appears that Aspergillus may not be the most common etiologic agent in allergic "Aspergillus" sinusitis. Allergic fungal sinusitis is not unusual and its incidence may be increasing. On initial clinical evaluation it may be easily mistaken for malignancy or invasive fungal disease with the potential for overly aggressive treatment. Preoperative suspicion of allergic fungal sinusitis based on clinical and roentgenographic findings along with careful communication with the mycology laboratory about the possibility of dematiaceous fungal growth are necessary for proper diagnosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rhinosinusitis: Establishing definitions for clinical research and patient care
Meltzer, E. O., Hamilos, D. L., Hadley, J. A., Lanza, D. C., Marple, B. F., Nicklas, R. A., Bachert, C., Baraniuk, J., Baroody, F. M., Benninger, M. S., et al. (2004) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2004.09.029 · Cited by 854
Diagnosis of Allergic Fungal Sinusitis
Bent, J. P., & Kuhn, F. A. (1994) · Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery · doi:10.1177/019459989411100508 · Cited by 733
Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery
Meltzer, E. O., Hamilos, D. L., Hadley, J. A., Lanza, D. C., Marple, B. F., Nicklas, R. A., Bachert, C., Baraniuk, J., Baroody, F. M., Benninger, M. S., et al. (2004) · Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2004.09.067 · Cited by 559
Fungal rhinosinusitis: A categorization and definitional schema addressing current controversies
Chakrabarti, A., Denning, D. W., Ferguson, B. J., Ponikau, J., Buzina, W., Kita, H., Marple, B., Panda, N., Vlaminck, S., Kauffmann‐Lacroix, C., et al. (2009) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1002/lary.20520 · Cited by 481
Socioeconomic factors in the diagnosis of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis.
Wise, S. K., Ghegan, M. D., Gorham, E., & Schlosser, R. J. (2008) · Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2007.10.020 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Manning, S. C., Schaefer, S. D., Close, L. G., & Vuitch, F.
- Venue
- Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1991-02-01
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 174-178
- ISSN
- 0886-4470 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2014876091
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Culture-Positive Allergic Fungal Sinusitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archotol.1991.01870140062007
- The paper
- Manning, S. C., Schaefer, S. D., Close, L. G., & Vuitch, F. (1991). Culture-Positive Allergic Fungal Sinusitis. Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1991.01870140062007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.