The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Physical Activity Screening Measure for Use With Adolescents in Primary Care
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop a reliable and valid physical activity screening measure for use with adolescents in primary care settings. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted 2 studies to evaluate the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of 6 single-item and 3 composite measures of physical activity. Modifications were based on the findings of the 2 studies, and a best measure was evaluated in study 3. Accelerometer data served as the criterion standard for tests of validity. RESULTS: In study 1 (N = 250; mean age, 15 years; 56% female; 36% white), reports on the composite measures were most reliable. In study 2 (N = 57; mean age, 14 years; 65% female; 37% white), 6 of the 9 screening measures correlated significantly with accelerometer data. Subjects, however, had great difficulty reporting bouts of activity and distinguishing between intensity levels. Instead, we developed a single measure assessing accumulation of 60 minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity. Evaluated in study 3 (N = 148; mean age, 12 years; 65% female; 27% white), the measure was reliable (intraclass correlation, 0.77) and correlated significantly (r = 0.40, P<.001) with accelerometer data. Correct classification (63%), sensitivity (71%), and false-positive rates (40%) were reasonable. CONCLUSION: The "moderate to vigorous physical activity" screening measure is recommended for clinical practice with adolescents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
Cited by
Guthold, R., Stevens, G. A., Riley, L. M., & Bull, F. C. (2020) · The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/s2352-4642(19)30323-2 · Cited by 4,033
Janssen, I., Katzmarzyk, P. T., Boyce, W. F., Vereecken, C., Mulvihill, C., Roberts, C., Currie, C., Pickett, W., & The Health Behaviour in School‐Aged Children Obesity Working Group (2005) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1467-789x.2005.00176.x · Cited by 1,169
Physical activity in European adolescents and associations with anxiety, depression and well-being
McMahon, E. M., Corcoran, P., O’Regan, G., Keeley, H., Cannon, M., Carli, V., Wasserman, C., Hadlaczky, G., Sarchiapone, M., Apter, A., et al. (2017) · European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s00787-016-0875-9 · Cited by 636
Fitzgerald, A., Fitzgerald, N., & Aherne, C. (2012) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.01.002 · Cited by 320
Physical activity, leisure-time screen use and depression among children and young adolescents
Kremer, P., Elshaug, C., Leslie, E., Toumbourou, J. W., Patton, G. C., & Williams, J. (2014) · Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport · doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2013.03.012 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Prochaska, J. J., Sallis, J. F., & Long, B.
- Venue
- Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2001-05-01
- Volume
- 155
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 554
- ISSN
- 1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163796935
- Cited by
- 1,002
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Physical Activity Screening Measure for Use With Adolescents in Primary Care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archpedi.155.5.554
- The paper
- Prochaska, J. J., Sallis, J. F., & Long, B. (2001). A Physical Activity Screening Measure for Use With Adolescents in Primary Care. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.155.5.554
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.