Cited by 27Virology and Viral DiseasesBacterial Infections and VaccinesVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

Clinical Evaluation of a New Measles-Mumps-Rubella Trivalent Vaccine

Schwarz, Anton J. F.·1975·Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine

Abstract

In a series of clinical studies of a combined measles (Schwarz strain), mumps (Jeryl Lynn strain), and rubella (Cendehill strain) vaccine, 1,481 children received the vaccine or a placebo. The vaccine did not cause any significant reactions. The frequencies of mild, transient fever or rash or both in triple-susceptible vaccinees were similar to those that follow use of Schwarz strain measles vaccine alone. Measles, mumps, and rubella seroconversion rates in triple-susceptible vaccinees ranged from 95% to 100%. Geometric mean antibody titers were as high as those that usually result from use of these same virus strains as monovalent vaccines.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpedi.1975.02120490026008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the two trials assessed as being at high risk of reporting bias (Bloom 1975; Schwarz 1975), adverse effects were reported for only 60% and 39% of participants, respectively.

    “In the two trials we assessed as being at high risk of reporting bias (Bloom 1975; Schwarz 1975), we reported adverse effects for only 60% and 39% of participants, respectively.”

    From Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children (2012) · cites this paper as Schwarz 1975

  • In Bloom 1975 and Schwarz 1975, the risk of reporting bias was high.

    “In the two trials we assessed as being at high risk of reporting bias (Bloom 1975; Schwarz 1975)”

    From Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children (2012) · cites this paper as Schwarz 1975

  • Bloom 1975 and Schwarz 1975 concluded that the incidence of raised temperature, rash, lymphadenopathy, coryza, rhinitis, cough, local reactions or limb and joint symptoms were not significantly different from placebo.

    “The trials by Bloom and Schwarz concluded that the incidence of raised temperature, rash, lymphadenopathy, coryza, rhinitis, cough, local reactions or limb and joint symptoms were not significantly different from placebo (Bloom 1975; Schwarz 1975).”

    From Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children (2012) · cites this paper as Schwarz 1975

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schwarz, A. J. F.
Corresponding author
Schwarz, Anton J. F.
Venue
Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
Published
1975-12-01
Volume
129
Issue
12
Pages
1408
ISSN
1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009286117
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Keywords
MMR vaccine, vaccine safety, vaccine adverse reactions, seroconversion, antibody titers, children
MeSH terms
Antibodies, Viral, Antibody Formation, Child, Child, Preschool, Drug Eruptions, Drug Evaluation, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Fever, Humans, Immunization, Infant, Male, Measles Vaccine, Mumps Vaccine, Placebos, Rubella Vaccine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review