Cited by 70Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologyHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Trapped in the Net: Will Internet Addiction Become a 21st-Century Epidemic?

Christakis, Dimitri A., Moreno, Megan A.·2009·Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.162

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Internet addiction and concurrent sleep deprivation are problems that merit awareness.

    “Other problems that merit awareness include Internet addiction and concurrent sleep deprivation. 7”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Christakis, D. A., & Moreno, M. A.
Venue
Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
Published
2009-10-05
Volume
163
Issue
10
Pages
959
ISSN
1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090718238
Cited by
70
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Humans, United States, Behavior, Addictive, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review