Cited by 83Injury Epidemiology and PreventionSports injuries and preventionPatient Safety and Medication Errors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Home Injury Hazard Reduction: The HOME Injury Study

Open access
Phelan, Kieran J., Khoury, Jane, Xu, Yingying, Liddy, Stacey, Hornung, Richard, Lanphear, Bruce P.·2011·Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of installing safety devices in the homes of young children on total injury rates and on injuries deemed a priori modifiable by the installation of these devices. DESIGN: A nested, prospective, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Indoor environment of housing units. PARTICIPANTS: Mothers and their children from birth to 3 years old participating in the Home Observation and Measures of the Environment study. Among 8878 prenatal patients, 1263 (14.2%) were eligible, 413 (32.7%) agreed to participate, and 355 were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 181) or control (n = 174) groups. INTERVENTION: Installation of multiple passive measures (eg, stair gates, cabinet locks, and smoke detectors) to reduce exposure to injury hazards. Injury hazards were assessed at home visits by teams of trained research assistants using a validated survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Modifiable and medically attended injury (ie, telephone calls, office visits, and emergency visits for injury). RESULTS: The mean age of children at intervention was 6.3 months. Injury hazards were reduced in the intervention homes but not in the control homes at 1 and 2 years (P < .004). There was no difference in the rate for all medically attended injuries in intervention children compared with controls: 14.3 injuries (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.7-21.1 injuries) vs 20.8 injuries (95% CI, 14.4-29.9 injuries) per 100 child-years (P = .17); but there was a significant reduction in the rate of modifiable medically attended injuries in intervention children compared with controls: 2.3 injuries (95% CI, 1.0-5.5 injuries) vs 7.7 injuries (95% CI, 4.2-14.2 injuries) per 100 child-years (P = .03). CONCLUSION: An intervention to reduce exposure to hazards in homes led to a 70% reduction in the rate of modifiable medically attended injury. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00129324.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.29

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The same RCT found a significant 70% reduction in the rate of modifiable medically attended injuries in intervention children compared with controls: 2.3 injuries versus 7.7 injuries per 100 child-years.

    “investigators found a significant 70% reduction in the rate of modifiable medically attended injuries in intervention children compared with controls: 2.3 injuries versus 7.7 injuries per 100 child-years (126).”
  • A two-year RCT in the United States showed that injury hazards were significantly reduced in intervention homes but not in control homes.

    “A two-year RCT in the United States showed that injury hazards were significantly reduced in intervention homes but not in control homes”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]Phelan KJ Khoury JC Kalkwarf HJ Lanphear BP Residential Injuries in US Children and Adolescents Public Health Rep 2005 120 1 63 70 15736333 PMC1497684

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Phelan, K. J., Khoury, J., Xu, Y., Liddy, S., Hornung, R., & Lanphear, B. P.
Affiliations
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Venue
Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
Published
2011-04-01
Volume
165
Issue
4
Pages
339-45
ISSN
1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019200604
Cited by
83
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • U.S. Public Health Service (R49CCR523141-01)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES014575, P01 ES11261, P01ES011261)
  • National Center for Injury Prevention and Control
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K23HD045770)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Keywords
home injury prevention, safety equipment, young children, smoke detectors
MeSH terms
Accidents, Home, Adult, Age Factors, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Protective Devices, Residence Characteristics, Socioeconomic Factors, Wounds and Injuries, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review