Cited by 42Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Schizophrenia and Arousal Revisited: Two-Flash Thresholds and Electrodermal Activity in Activated and Nonactivated Conditions

Gruzelier, John H.·1972·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

The relation between two-flash thresholds (TFTs) and electrodermal activity—skin conductance level (SCL) and skin potential level (SPL), of paranoid and nonparanoid schizophrenics and normal controls was examined in activated and nonactivated conditions. A bicycle ergometer which induced significant changes in heart rate was used as an activator. At low levels of skin potential and skin conductance the two-flash thresholds of the controls were positively related to skin potential and skin conductance whereas at higher levels of skin potential and skin conductance, and in activated conditions, a negative relation was found. In general the two-flash thresholds of both schizophrenic groups were negatively related to skin potential and skin conductance in nonactivated conditions; when activated the paranoids showed the same changes as normals while the nonparanoids showed raised two-flash thresholds and lowered skin conductance levels. These findings are interpreted as showing the operation of inhibitory processes, consonant with the concept of protective inhibition, elicited as somatic arousal increases in nonparanoid but not paranoid schizophrenics.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpsyc.1972.01750230037007

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Approximately 40-60% of the schizophrenia population has been classified as electrodermal activity non-responders, substantially greater than the proportion of healthy individuals who are non-responders.

    “Approximately 40–60% of the SCZ population has been classified as EDA non-responders gave their significantly suppressed skin conductance in response to noxious stimuli40,41; this is substantially greater than the proportion of healthy individuals that are EDA non-responders39.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gruzelier, J. H.
Corresponding author
Gruzelier, John H.
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
1972-05-01
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
427
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079292066
Cited by
42
References
28
Citations by year
2021: 1
FWCI
9.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
schizophrenia, paranoid schizophrenia, electrodermal activity, skin conductance level, somatic arousal, inhibitory processes, cycle ergometer
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Diagnosis, Differential, Differential Threshold, Electrophysiology, Physical Exertion, Galvanic Skin Response, Heart Rate, Hippocampus, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Light, Male, Muscle Contraction, Paranoid Disorders, Psychophysics, Schizophrenia, Skin Physiological Phenomena, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review