CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,902Psychiatric care and mental health servicesHistorical Psychiatry and Medical PracticesSchizophrenia research and treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Alternative to Mental Hospital Treatment: I. Conceptual Model, Treatment Program, and Clinical Evaluation

Stein, Leonard I.·1980·Archives of General Psychiatry
DOI 10.1001/archpsyc.1980.01780170034003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A conceptual model for the development of community-based treatment programs for the chronically disabled psychiatric patient was developed, and the results of a controlled study and follow-up are reported. A community-treatment program that was based on the conceptual model was compared with conventional treatment (ie, progressive short-term hospitalization plus aftercare). The results have shown that use of the community program for 14 months greatly reduced the need to hospitalize patients and enhanced the community tenure and adjustment of the experimental patients. When the special programming was discontinued, many of the gains that were attained deteriorated, and use of the hospital rose sharply. The results suggest that community programming should be comprehensive and ongoing.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpsyc.1980.01780170034003

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,902

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Stein, L. I.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Stein, Leonard I.
ORCID
Stein, Leonard I.
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Published
1980-04-01
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
392
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1001/archpsyc.1980.01780170034003
OpenAlex
W2018237572
Cited by
1,902
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 61
FWCI
24.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
deinstitutionalization, psychiatric hospitalization, follow-up care, communal land tenure, relapse, conceptual model
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Chronic Disease, Community Mental Health Services, Employment, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Hospitals, State, Humans, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Personal Satisfaction, Self Concept, Social Adjustment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review