Cited by 1,157Schizophrenia research and treatmentFamily Caregiving in Mental IllnessCounseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics

The Social Functioning Scale the Development and Validation of a New Scale of Social Adjustment for use in Family Intervention Programmes with Schizophrenic Patients

Birchwood, Max, Smith, Jo, Cochrane, Ray, Wetton, Sheila, Copestake, Sonja·1990·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Social functioning as an outcome variable in family interventions with schizophrenic patients has been a relatively neglected area. The requirements of a scale of social functioning to measure the efficacy of family interventions include: the measurement of skill/behaviour relevant to the impairments and the demography of this group; the ability to yield considerable information with an economy of clinical time; and the establishment of 'comparative' need through comparison between subscales and with appropriate reference groups. Results from three samples show that the Social Functioning Scale is reliable, valid, sensitive and responsive to change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.157.6.853

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The SFS is a more comprehensive measure of social functioning than the GAF.

    “the SFS assesses social functioning across a number of domains including social engagement/withdrawal, interpersonal, prosocial, recreation, independence–competence/performance and employment as rated by the individual themselves, thereby rendering this scale a more comprehensive measure of social functioning (Birchwood et al. 1990).”

    From Social Functioning Interventions in Psychosis: A Systematic Review. (2025) · cites this paper as Birchwood et al. 1990

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Birchwood, M., Smith, J., Cochrane, R., Wetton, S., & Copestake, S.
Affiliations
  • All Saints Hospital (ZA)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Birchwood, Max
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1990-12
Volume
157
Issue
6
Pages
853-859
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W1978508380
Cited by
1,157
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 80 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 51
FWCI
4.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Worcester Research and Publications (University of Worcester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
Social Functioning Scale, social functioning, social adaptation, schizophrenia, family intervention, scale development, psychometric validation, outcome measures, family therapy, scale reliability
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Family Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Personality Tests, Psychometrics, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Social Adjustment, Social Behavior, Social Environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review