The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Lithium Carbonate Augmentation of Antidepressant Treatment: An Effective Prescription for Treatment-Refractory Depression
Abstract
To assess whether lithium carbonate augments antidepressant effects of long-term antidepressant treatment in non-responding patients, 15 treatment-refractory patients were studied using a placebo-controlled, double-blind design. After at least 21 days of antidepressant drug therapy, and while continuing to receive the same daily dose of antidepressant drug, eight patients received lithium carbonate and seven received placebo. In comparison with placebo, lithium carbonate produced a small but statistically significant improvement in the mean daily nursing ratings of depression during the first two days of treatment. The beneficial effects of lithium carbonate were more variable during the next four days, but by the seventh through 12th day of the trial, the drug produced a significant and clinically meaningful improvement. When the seven placebo-treated patients received active lithium carbonate on the 13th day of the study, their rate of improvement was similar to that of the eight patients who had received active lithium carbonate initially. This augmentation of the anti-depressant effect was seen in patients treated with desipramine hydrochloride, amitriptyline hydrochloride, or mianserin hydrochloride. Although in five of the 15 patients, the improvement appeared as early as 24 to 48 hours after the first lithium carbonate dose, the remaining patients did not show a clear improvement until approximately five to eight days later. We concluded that lithium carbonate does augment the antidepressant effect when added to the long-term antidepressant treatment of nonresponding patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sackeim, H. A., Haskett, R. F., Mulsant, B. H., Thase, M. E., Mann, J. J., Pettinati, H. M., Greenberg, R. M., Crowe, R. R., Cooper, T. B., & Prudic, J. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.10.1299 · Cited by 686
Nuñez, N. A., Joseph, B., Pahwa, M., Kumar, R., Resendez, M. G., Prokop, L. J., Veldic, M., Seshadri, A., Biernacka, J. M., Frye, M. A., et al. (2022) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.134 · Cited by 215
The behavioral actions of lithium in rodent models: Leads to develop novel therapeutics
O’Donnell, K. C., & Gould, T. D. (2007) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.04.002 · Cited by 137
Carvalho, A. F., Cavalcante, J. L., Castelo, M. S., & Lima, M. C. O. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2710.2007.00846.x · Cited by 110
Vázquez, G. H., Bahji, A., Undurraga, J., Tondo, L., & Baldessarini, R. J. (2021) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/02698811211013579 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Heninger, G. R.
- Venue
- Archives of General Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1983-12-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1335
- ISSN
- 0003-990X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986803960
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lithium Carbonate Augmentation of Antidepressant Treatment: An Effective Prescription for Treatment-Refractory Depression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archpsyc.1983.01790110077013
- The paper
- Heninger, G. R. (1983). Lithium Carbonate Augmentation of Antidepressant Treatment: An Effective Prescription for Treatment-Refractory Depression. Archives of General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1983.01790110077013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.