The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Structured Psychiatric Intervention for Cancer Patients: I. Changes Over Time in Methods of Coping and Affective Disturbance
Abstract
We evaluated the immediate and long-term effects on psychological distress and coping methods of a 6-week, structured, psychiatric group intervention for postsurgical patients with malignant melanoma. The intervention consisted of health education, enhancement of problem-solving skills, stress management (eg, relaxation techniques), and psychological support. In spite of good prognosis, most patients had high levels of psychological distress at baseline, comparable with other patients with cancer. However, at the end of brief psychiatric intervention, the experimental subjects (n = 38), while not without some distress, exhibited higher vigor and greater use of active-behavioral coping than the controls (n = 28). At 6 months' follow-up, the group differences were even more pronounced. The intervention-group patients then showed significantly lower depression, fatigue, confusion, and total mood disturbance as well as higher vigor. They were also using significantly more active-behavioral and active-cognitive coping than the controls. These results indicate that a short-term psychiatric group intervention for patients with malignant melanoma effectively reduces psychological distress and enhances longer-term effective coping.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833
EFFECT OF PSYCHOSOCIAL TREATMENT ON SURVIVAL OF PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC BREAST CANCER
Spiegel, D., Kraemer, H., Bloom, J., & Gottheil, E. (1989) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(89)91551-1 · Cited by 2,353
Group Support for Patients With Metastatic Cancer: A Randomized Prospective Outcome Study
Spiegel, D. (1981) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1980.01780300039004 · Cited by 862
Psychological Coping Mechanisms and Survival Time in Metastatic Breast Cancer
Derogatis, L. R. (1979) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.242.14.1504 · Cited by 500
Cited by
Speca, M., Carlson, L. E., Goodey, E., & Angen, M. (2000) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-200009000-00004 · Cited by 1,082
Faller, H., Schuler, M., Richard, M., Heckl, U., Weis, J., & Küffner, R. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.40.8922 · Cited by 912
Depression and cancer: mechanisms and disease progression
Spiegel, D., & Giese-Davis, J. (2003) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00566-3 · Cited by 874
Measurement of depressive symptoms in cancer patients
Hann, D., Winter, K., & Jacobsen, P. (1999) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(99)00004-5 · Cited by 822
Emotionally expressive coping predicts psychological and physical adjustment to breast cancer
Stanton, A. L., Danoff-Burg, S., Cameron, C. L., Bishop, M., Collins, C. A., Kirk, S. B., Sworowski, L. A., & Twillman, R. (2000) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.68.5.875 · Cited by 800
Metadata
- Authors
- Fawzy, F. I.
- Venue
- Archives of General Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1990-08-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 720
- ISSN
- 0003-990X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121249556
- Cited by
- 645
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.