The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical and Biologic Response to Clozapine in Patients With Schizophrenia: Crossover Comparison With Fluphenazine
Abstract
Twenty-one patients with schizophrenia who met criteria for neuroleptic treatment resistance or intolerance participated in a crossover, placebo-controlled, double-blind comparison of long-term typical neuroleptic and clozapine treatment. Clozapine significantly reduced total as well as positive and negative symptoms in comparison with both fluphenazine and placebo. Of the 21 patients, eight (38%) showed clozapine superiority on the basis of prospective response criteria. High levels of extrapyramidal side effects during fluphenazine treatment and later onset of illness were clinical predictors of clozapine superiority. Clozapine and fluphenazine equally reduced plasma homovanillic acid levels in comparison with placebo, although fluphenazine but not clozapine increased plasma prolactin level. A striking biologic difference between clozapine and fluphenazine was clozapine's enhancement of indexes of noradrenergic activity. Superior clozapine response was predicted by low ratios of cerebrospinal fluid homovanillic acid to 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, consistent with the notion that balance between dopaminergic and serotoninergic systems is important for clozapine's mechanism of action.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale.
Overall, J. E., & Gorham, D. R. (1962) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1962.10.3.799 · Cited by 11,090
Dopamine Receptor Binding Predicts Clinical and Pharmacological Potencies of Antischizophrenic Drugs
Creese, I., Burt, D. R., & Snyder, S. H. (1976) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3854 · Cited by 2,220
Antipsychotic drug doses and neuroleptic/dopamine receptors
SEEMAN, P., LEE, T., CHAU-WONG, M., & WONG, K. (1976) · Nature · doi:10.1038/261717a0 · Cited by 1,622
Breier, A. (1991) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1991.01810270051007 · Cited by 626
Cited by
McEvoy, J. P., Lieberman, J. A., Stroup, T. S., Davis, S. M., Meltzer, H. Y., Rosenheck, R. A., Swartz, M. S., Perkins, D. O., Keefe, R. S. E., Davis, C. E., et al. (2006) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.2006.163.4.600 · Cited by 1,018
Childhood-Onset Schizophrenia: A Double-blind Clozapine-Haloperidol Comparison
Kumra, S. (1996) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830120020005 · Cited by 410
Atypical antipsychotics: new directions and new challenges in the treatment of schizophrenia
Kapur, S., & Remington, G. (2001) · Annual Review of Medicine · doi:10.1146/annurev.med.52.1.503 · Cited by 324
Mechanisms of action of atypical antipsychotic drugs: a critical analysis
Kinon, B. J., & Lieberman, J. A. (1996) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf02245602 · Cited by 317
Tauscher, J., Hussain, T., Agid, O., Verhoeff, N. P. L. G., Wilson, A. A., Houle, S., Remington, G., Zipursky, R. B., & Kapur, S. (2004) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.161.9.1620 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Pickar, D.
- Venue
- Archives of General Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1992-05-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 345
- ISSN
- 0003-990X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088879645
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 24.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical and Biologic Response to Clozapine in Patients With Schizophrenia: Crossover Comparison With Fluphenazine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820050009001
- The paper
- Pickar, D. (1992). Clinical and Biologic Response to Clozapine in Patients With Schizophrenia: Crossover Comparison With Fluphenazine. Archives of General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820050009001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.