The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neuropsychological Impairments in Deficit vs Nondeficit Forms of Schizophrenia
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that functional impairments of the frontal and parietal lobes are related to the deficit symptoms of schizophrenia. The purpose of the current study was to examine whether neuropsychological measures of frontal and parietal lobe function differentiated deficit from nondeficit patients. Neuropsychological measures of temporal lobe function were used as contrast measures. METHODS: The performance of 18 deficit and 21 nondeficit schizophrenic patients was examined on neuropsychological measures of executive, visuospatial, and memory functions, selected on the basis of their association with lesions of either the frontal, parietal, or temporal lobes. The results from the schizophrenic subgroups were compared with the results on the same measures obtained from 30 normal controls. RESULTS: Deficit patients performed more poorly than nondeficit patients on two frontal lobe measures, the Stroop Color-Word Interference and Trails Making B tests, and one parietal lobe measure, the Mooney Faces Closure Test. There were no differences in performance on the temporal lobe measures between the two groups. Both groups performed more poorly on the tests than the normal controls. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that deficit patients may have greater performance impairments on neuropsychological measures associated with frontal and parietal neuropsychological abnormalities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex
Alexander, G. E., DeLong, M. R., & Strick, P. L. (1986) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.09.030186.002041 · Cited by 8,527
Functional architecture of basal ganglia circuits: neural substrates of parallel processing
Alexander, G. E., & Crutcher, M. D. (1990) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(90)90107-l · Cited by 4,131
Cited by
Stability and Course of Neuropsychological Deficits in Schizophrenia
Heaton, R. K., Gladsjo, J. A., Palmer, B. W., Kuck, J., Marcotte, T. D., & Jeste, D. V. (2001) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.58.1.24 · Cited by 618
Buchanan, R. W. (2005) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbi020 · Cited by 438
Self-citationEmotion recognition deficit in schizophrenia: Association with symptomatology and cognition
Kohler, C. G., Bilker, W., Hagendoorn, M., Gur, R. E., & Gur, R. C. (2000) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(00)00847-7 · Cited by 437
Perceptual grouping in disorganized schizophrenia
Uhlhaas, P. J., Phillips, W. A., Mitchell, G., & Silverstein, S. M. (2006) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2005.10.016 · Cited by 149
Emotional responding in deficit and non-deficit schizophrenia
Earnst, K. S., & Kring, A. M. (1999) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/s0165-1781(99)00083-9 · Cited by 124
Revisiting the Diagnosis of Schizophrenia: Where have we been and Where are We Going?
Keller, W. R., Fischer, B. A., & Carpenter Jr., W. T. (2011) · CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1755-5949.2010.00229.x · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Buchanan, R. W.
- Venue
- Archives of General Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1994-10-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 804
- ISSN
- 0003-990X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055482170
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.