Cited by 46Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryPsychology and Mental Health

Revisiting the Diagnosis of Schizophrenia: Where have we been and Where are We Going?

Open access
Keller, William R., Fischer, Bernard A., Carpenter Jr., William T.·2011·CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics

Abstract

Appropriate and reliable classification of mental illness is crucial for advancing the field of psychiatry as agreement on diagnosis has broad implications for treatment of mental disorders and research into the etiopathophysiology of mental disorders. Since schizophrenia was first recognized by Kraepelin (as dementia praecox), there has been much discussion about what does and does not diagnostically constitute the disorder. The importance placed upon different symptoms and course types associated with schizophrenia has been as heterogeneous as the disorder itself. This article focuses upon the classification of schizophrenia over the last 100 years, the current diagnosis of schizophrenia, changes for schizophrenia planned in the upcoming DSM 5, future directions for improving the diagnosis of schizophrenia, and the implications of a new diagnostic paradigm for the illness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2010.00229.x

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In ICD-11, the nine ICD-10 schizophrenia subtypes are omitted because of their longitudinal instability and lack of prognostic validity, and replaced by coded symptom and course qualifiers.

    “Similar to the DSM-5, in the ICD-11, the nine ICD-10 schizophrenia subtypes (paranoid, hebephrenic, catatonic, etc.) are now omitted because of their longitudinal instability and lack of prognostic validity [21], and have been replaced by a system of coded symptom and course qualifiers (see below).”

    From Mental, behavioral and neurodevelopmental disorders in the ICD-11: an international perspective on key changes and controversies (2020) · cites this paper as [21]

    In “The Emphasis on Reality Distortion in Current Diagnosis” (page unavailable), the paper explicitly describes schizophrenia subtypes as unstable across episodes. It says reality-distortion symptoms do not predict course or outcome, but does not directly establish the prognostic validity of the subtypes or discuss ICD-11’s omission of them and replacement with coded qualifiers. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cermolacce M, Sass L, Parnas J. What is bizarre in bizarre delusions? Crit Rev Schizophr Bull 2010;36:667-679.
  2. Kirkpatrick B, Conley RC, Kakoyannis A, Reep RL, Roberts RC. Interstitial cells of the white matter in the inferior parietal cortex in schizophrenia: An unbiased cell-counting study. Synapse 1999;34:95-102.
  3. Kirkpatrick B, Mitchell BD, DeLisi LE. Concordance of the deficit/nondeficit categorization in affected siblings. Schizophr Bull 2007;33:282.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keller, W. R., Fischer, B. A., & Carpenter Jr., W. T.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Venue
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12-27
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
83-88
ISSN
1755-5930 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1499358446
Cited by
46
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
schizophrenia, diagnosis, classification of mental illness, DSM-5, dementia praecox, Kraepelin, diagnostic criteria, symptom heterogeneity, clinical course, history of psychiatry
MeSH terms
Humans, Psychiatry, Schizophrenia, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review