The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Awareness of Illness in Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective and Mood Disorders
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The literature on insight, or self-awareness, in schizophrenia suggests that this cognitive dimension may be of nosological value. Poor insight has descriptive validity at the phenomenological and neuropsychological levels of schizophrenia and has prognostic validity in terms of the prediction of the course of illness. The lack of empirical data on the diagnostic specificity of poor insight to schizophrenia and the previous use of insight measures with questionable reliability and validity have limited this interpretation. METHODS: In the present study, we assessed insight into multiple aspects of mental disorder using a measure with demonstrated reliability and validity. A sample of 412 patients with psychotic and mood disorders coming from geographically diverse regions of the United States and one international site was studied. The main aims were to determine the prevalence of self-awareness deficits in patients in whom schizophrenia was diagnosed, to examine the relative severity of self-awareness deficits associated with schizophrenia compared with that of schizoaffective and mood disorders with and without psychosis, and to evaluate the clinical correlates of self-awareness in patients with schizophrenia. RESULTS: The results indicated that poor insight is a prevalent feature of schizophrenia. A variety of self-awareness deficits are more severe and pervasive in patients with schizophrenia than in patients with schizoaffective or major depressive disorders with or without psychosis and are associated with poorer psychosocial functioning. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that severe self-awareness deficits are a prevalent feature of schizophrenia, perhaps stemming from the neuropsychological dysfunction associated with the disorder, and are more common in schizophrenia than in other psychotic disorders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Global Assessment Scale: A Procedure for Measuring Overall Severity of Psychiatric Disturbance
Endicott, J. (1976) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770060086012 · Cited by 4,982
Cited by
How stigma interferes with mental health care.
Corrigan, P. (2004) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.7.614 · Cited by 3,648
The Brown assessment of beliefs scale: Reliability and validity
Eisen, J. L., Phillips, K. A., Baer, L., Beer, D. A., Atala, K. D., & Rasmussen, S. A. (1998) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.155.1.102 · Cited by 705
Lysaker, P. H., Roe, D., & Yanos, P. T. (2006) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbl016 · Cited by 688
Insight in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis
Mintz, A. R., Dobson, K. S., & Romney, D. M. (2003) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/s0920-9964(02)00316-x · Cited by 563
Lincoln, T. M., Lullmann, E., & Rief, W. (2006) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbm002 · Cited by 486
Metadata
- Authors
- Amador, X. F.
- Venue
- Archives of General Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1994-10-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 826
- ISSN
- 0003-990X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043477792
- Cited by
- 896
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Awareness of Illness in Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective and Mood Disorders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950100074007
- The paper
- Amador, X. F. (1994). Awareness of Illness in Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective and Mood Disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950100074007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.