Cited by 705Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

The Brown assessment of beliefs scale: Reliability and validity

Eisen, Jane L., Phillips, Katharine A., Baer, Lee, Beer, Douglas A., Atala, Katherine D., Rasmussen, Steven A.·1998·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors developed and evaluated the reliability and validity of the Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale, a clinician-administered seven-item scale designed to assess delusions across a wide range of psychiatric disorders. METHOD: The authors developed the scale after reviewing the literature on the assessment of delusions. Four raters administered the scale to 20 patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), 20 patients with body dysmorphic disorder, and 10 patients with mood disorder with psychotic features. Audiotaped interviews of scale administration conducted by one rater were independently scored by the other raters to evaluate interrater reliability. The scale was administered to 27 patients twice to determine test-retest reliability. Other insight instruments as well as scales that assess symptom severity were administered to assess convergent and discriminant validity. Sensitivity to change was assessed in a multicenter treatment study of sertraline for OCD. RESULTS: Interrater and test-retest reliability for the total score and individual item scores was excellent, with a high degree of internal consistency. One factor was obtained that accounted for 56% of the variance. Scores on the Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale were not correlated with symptom severity but were correlated with other measures of insight. The scale was sensitive to change in insight in OCD but was not identical to improvement in severity. CONCLUSIONS: The Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing delusionality in a number of psychiatric disorders. This scale may help clarify whether delusional and nondelusional variants of disorders constitute the same disorder as well as whether delusionality affects treatment outcome and prognosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.155.1.102

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eisen, J. L., Phillips, K. A., Baer, L., Beer, D. A., Atala, K. D., & Rasmussen, S. A.
Affiliations
Butler Hospital (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1998-01-01
Volume
155
Issue
1
Pages
102-108
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2137677848
Cited by
705
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 51
FWCI
6.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
delusions, obsessive-compulsive disorder, body dysmorphic disorder, insight, inter-rater reliability, test-retest reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, sensitivity to change, sertraline, scale development
MeSH terms
Adult, Affective Disorders, Psychotic, Awareness, Mental Disorders, Delusions, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Personality Inventory, Prognosis, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Somatoform Disorders, Tape Recording, 1-Naphthylamine, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome, Sertraline

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review