Clinical efficacy of methylphenidate in conduct disorder with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
Abstract
Background Stimulants are not considered appropriate for the treatment of children with conduct disorders (CDs). The postulated differences in stimulant effect between children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and CD led to the hypothesis that methylphenidate hydrochloride, which is effective in ADHD, would not significantly improve symptoms of CD. Methods We randomly assigned 84 children with CD, between the ages of 6 and 15 years, to receive methylphenidate hydrochloride (up to 60 mg/d) or placebo for 5 weeks. Behavior was evaluated by parent, teacher, and clinician reports and by direct classroom observations. Two thirds of the children also met criteria for ADHD. Results Contrary to prediction, ratings of antisocial behaviors specific to CD were significantly reduced by methylphenidate treatment. The magnitude of methylphenidate effect indicated meaningful clinical benefit. Partialling out severity of ADHD did not alter the significant superiority of methylphenidate on CD ratings specifically (P Conclusions Methylphenidate has short-term positive effects on children and adolescents with CD. Key aspects of antisocial adjustment appear to be treatment responsive. This effect was independent of severity of the children's initial ADHD symptoms.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Initial studies suggest that methylphenidate also has an impact on emotional dysregulation behaviors in ASPD and CD as well as BPD.
“This idea is in line with initial studies, suggesting that methylphenidate also has an impact on emotional dysregulation behaviors in ASPD and CD (Kaplan et al., 1990; Brown et al., 1991; Klein et al., 1997; Connor et al., 2000) as well as BPD (Schulz et al., 1988; Golubchik et al., 2008; Prada et al., 2015; although see Schulz et al. (1988) for possible issue with schizotypal comorbidity).”
From Top-Down Dysregulation—From ADHD to Emotional Instability (2016) · cites this paper as Klein et al., 1997
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 44 · Cited by 349
- Authors
- Klein, R. G.
- Corresponding author
- Klein, Rachel G.
- Venue
- Archives of General Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1997-12-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1073
- ISSN
- 0003-990X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2139910250
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 11.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH-35779)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Keywords
- methylphenidate, conduct disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, stimulant medication, antisocial behavior, children and adolescents, treatment response
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Aggression, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Parents, Placebos, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Severity of Illness Index, Teaching, Comorbidity, Treatment Outcome, Conduct Disorder
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review