The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neuropsychological Change in Early Phase Schizophrenia During 12 Months of Treatment With Olanzapine, Risperidone, or Haloperidol
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this investigation was to test the efficacy of novel antipsychotic medications in the treatment of cognitive impairment in early phase schizophrenia. METHODS: Sixty-five patients in this multicenter double-blind study were randomly assigned to olanzapine (5-20 mg), risperidone (4-10 mg), or haloperidol (5-20 mg). Standard measures of clinical and motor syndromes were administered, as well as a comprehensive battery of tests to assess (1) motor skills, (2) attention span, (3) verbal fluency and reasoning, (4) nonverbal fluency and construction, (5) executive skills, and (6) immediate recall at baseline and after 6, 30, and 54 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: The general cognitive index derived from the 6 domain scores revealed a significantly greater benefit from treatment with olanzapine relative to haloperidol and olanzapine relative to risperidone, but no significant difference was shown between risperidone and haloperidol. The improvement related to olanzapine was apparent after 6 weeks and enhanced after 30 and 54 weeks of treatment. Exploratory within-group analyses of the 6 cognitive domains after a conservative Bonferroni adjustment revealed a significant improvement with olanzapine only on the immediate recall domain, and similar analyses of the 17 individual tests revealed a significant improvement with olanzapine only on the Hooper Visual Organization Test. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that olanzapine has some superior cognitive benefits relative to haloperidol and risperidone. A larger sample replication study is necessary to confirm and generalize the observations of this study and begin evaluation of the implications of this change to cerebral function and quality of life for people with schizophrenia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What are the functional consequences of neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia?
(1996) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.153.3.321 · Cited by 3,516
Cited by
Miyamoto, S., Duncan, G. E., Marx, C. E., & Lieberman, J. A. (2005) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4001556 · Cited by 988
Bilder, R. M., Goldman, R. S., Volavka, J., Czobor, P., Hoptman, M., Sheitman, B., Lindenmayer, J.-P., Citrome, L., McEvoy, J., Kunz, M., et al. (2002) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.6.1018 · Cited by 538
Early intervention for psychosis
Marshall, M., & Rathbone, J. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004718.pub3 · Cited by 531
The Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT): Updated Treatment Recommendations 2009
Kreyenbuhl, J., Buchanan, R. W., Dickerson, F. B., & Dixon, L. B. (2010) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbp130 · Cited by 499
Kodama, M., Fujioka, T., & Duman, R. S. (2004) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.07.008 · Cited by 387
Metadata
- Authors
- Purdon, S. E.
- Venue
- Archives of General Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2000-03-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 249
- ISSN
- 0003-990X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2041495183
- Cited by
- 469
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 34.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuropsychological Change in Early Phase Schizophrenia During 12 Months of Treatment With Olanzapine, Risperidone, or Haloperidol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archpsyc.57.3.249
- The paper
- Purdon, S. E. (2000). Neuropsychological Change in Early Phase Schizophrenia During 12 Months of Treatment With Olanzapine, Risperidone, or Haloperidol. Archives of General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.57.3.249
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.