Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 321

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Fluoxetine in Body Dysmorphic Disorder

Open access
Phillips, Katharine A., Albertini, Ralph S., Rasmussen, Steven A.·2002·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research on the pharmacotherapy of body dysmorphic disorder (BDD), a common and often disabling disorder, is limited. Available data suggest that this disorder may respond to serotonin reuptake inhibitors. However, no placebo-controlled treatment studies of BDD have been published. METHODS: Seventy-four patients with DSM-IV BDD or its delusional variant were enrolled and 67 were randomized into a placebo-controlled parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluoxetine hydrochloride. After 1 week of single-blind placebo treatment, patients were randomized to receive 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with fluoxetine or placebo. Outcome measures included the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD-YBOCS) (the primary outcome measure), the Clinical Global Impressions Scale, the Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale, and other measures. RESULTS: Results of the BDD-YBOCS indicated that fluoxetine was significantly more effective than placebo for BDD beginning at week 8 and continuing at weeks 10 and 12 (F(1,64) = 16.5; P<.001). The response rate was 18 (53%) of 34 to fluoxetine and 6 (18%) of 33 to the placebo (chi(2)(1) = 8.8; P=.003). The BDD symptoms of delusional patients were as likely as those of nondelusional patients to respond to fluoxetine, and no delusional patients responded to the placebo. In the sample as a whole, treatment response was independent of the duration and severity of BDD and the presence of major depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, or a personality disorder. Fluoxetine was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Fluoxetine is safe and more effective than placebo in delusional and nondelusional patients with BDD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpsyc.59.4.381

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 321

Metadata

Authors
Phillips, K. A., Albertini, R. S., & Rasmussen, S. A.
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
2002-04-01
Volume
59
Issue
4
Pages
381
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136764176
Cited by
321
References
5
FWCI
21.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Fluoxetine in Body Dysmorphic Disorder. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archpsyc.59.4.381
The paper
Phillips, K. A., Albertini, R. S., & Rasmussen, S. A. (2002). A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Fluoxetine in Body Dysmorphic Disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.59.4.381

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.