The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficacy of Disulfiram and Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Cocaine-DependentOutpatients: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: Disulfiram has emerged as a promising treatment for cocaine dependence, but it has not yet been evaluated in general populations of cocaine users. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of disulfiram therapy with that of a placebo condition in reducing cocaine use and to compare the effectiveness of 2 active behavioral therapies-cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) and interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT)-in reducing cocaine use. DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked (for medication condition), factorial (2 x 2) trial with 4 treatment conditions: disulfiram plus CBT, disulfiram plus IPT, placebo plus CBT, and placebo plus IPT. SETTING: A community-based outpatient substance abuse treatment program. PATIENTS: A total of 121 individuals meeting the criteria for current cocaine dependence. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received either disulfiram (250 mg/d) or placebo in identical capsules. Medication compliance was monitored using a riboflavin marker procedure. Both behavioral therapies (CBT and IPT) were manual guided and were delivered in individual sessions for 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Random regression analyses of self-reported frequency of cocaine use and results of urine toxicology screens. RESULTS: Participants assigned to disulfiram reduced their cocaine use significantly more than those assigned to placebo, and those assigned to CBT reduced their cocaine use significantly more than those assigned to IPT (P<.01 for both). Findings were consistent across all study samples (eg, intention to treat, treatment initiators, and treatment completers). Benefits of disulfiram use and CBT were most pronounced for participants who were not alcohol dependent at baseline or who fully abstained from drinking alcohol during treatment. Adverse effects experienced by participants who received disulfiram were mild and were not considerably different from those experienced by participants who received placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Disulfiram and CBT are effective therapies for general populations of cocaine-dependent individuals. Disulfiram seems to exert a direct effect on cocaine use rather than through reducing concurrent alcohol use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Relapse Prevention: Maintenance Strategies in the Treatment of Addictive Behaviors
Washton, A. M. (1986) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol · doi:10.15288/jsa.1986.47.260 · Cited by 2,527
Comparative Studies of Psychotherapies: Is It True That "Everyone Has Won and All Must Have Prizes"?
Luborsky, L. (1975) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1975.01760260059004 · Cited by 1,485
Interpersonal Psychotherapy Of Depression
Klerman, G. L. (1984) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,315
The Effects of Psychosocial Services in Substance Abuse Treatment
McLellan, A. T. (1993) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03500150065028 · Cited by 869
Interpersonal Psychotherapy of Depression
RUSH, A. J. (1985) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.142.11.1381 · Cited by 827
Gibbons, R. D. (1993) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820210073009 · Cited by 719
Fals-Stewart, W., O'Farrell, T. J., Freitas, T. T., McFarlin, S. K., & Rutigliano, P. (2000) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.68.1.134 · Cited by 671
Robinson, L. A., Berman, J. S., & Neimeyer, R. A. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.108.1.30 · Cited by 671
The Dodo bird verdict is alive and well-mostly.
Luborsky, L., Rosenthal, R., Diguer, L., Andrusyna, T. P., Berman, J. S., Levitt, J. T., Seligman, D. A., & Krause, E. D. (2002) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.9.1.2 · Cited by 581
Cited by
Magill, M., & Ray, L. A. (2009) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs · doi:10.15288/jsad.2009.70.516 · Cited by 694
Is cognitive–behavioral therapy more effective than other therapies?
Tolin, D. F. (2010) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.05.003 · Cited by 645
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Substance Use Disorders
McHugh, R. K., Hearon, B. A., & Otto, M. W. (2010) · Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.psc.2010.04.012 · Cited by 626
Sholomskas, D. E., Syracuse-Siewert, G., Rounsaville, B. J., Ball, S. A., Nuro, K. F., & Carroll, K. M. (2005) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.73.1.106 · Cited by 628
Self-citationNeurobiologic processes in drug reward and addiction
Adinoff, B. (2004) · Harvard Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/10673220490910844 · Cited by 546
Metadata
- Authors
- Carroll, K. M., Fenton, L. R., Ball, S. A., Nich, C., Frankforter, T. L., Shi, J., & Rounsaville, B. J.
- Venue
- Archives of General Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2004-03-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 264
- ISSN
- 0003-990X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2156122963
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 23.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy of Disulfiram and Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Cocaine-DependentOutpatients: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archpsyc.61.3.264
- The paper
- Carroll, K. M., Fenton, L. R., Ball, S. A., Nich, C., Frankforter, T. L., Shi, J., & Rounsaville, B. J. (2004). Efficacy of Disulfiram and Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Cocaine-DependentOutpatients: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. Archives of General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.61.3.264
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.