Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 475

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Four-Year Prospective Outcome and Natural History of Mania in ChildrenWith a Prepubertal and Early Adolescent Bipolar Disorder Phenotype

Geller, Barbara, Tillman, Rebecca, Craney, James L., Bolhofner, Kristine·2004·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of child mania has been contentious. OBJECTIVE: To investigate natural history and prospective validation of the existence and long-episode duration of mania in children. DESIGN: Four-year prospective longitudinal study of 86 subjects with intake episode mania who were all assessed at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 months. The phenotype was defined as DSM-IV bipolar I disorder (manic or mixed) with at least 1 cardinal symptom (elation and/or grandiosity) to ensure differentiation from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Parent and child informants were separately interviewed, by highly experienced research nurses, using the Washington University in St Louis Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (WASH-U-KSADS). A Children's Global Assessment Scale score of 60 or less was needed to establish definite impairment. Treatment was by subjects' community practitioners. SETTING: Research unit in a university medical school. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects were obtained from psychiatric and pediatric sites by consecutive new case ascertainment, and their baseline age was 10.8 +/- 2.7 years. Onset of the baseline episode was 7.4 +/- 3.5 years. (Data are given as mean +/- SD.) MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Episode duration, weeks ill, recovery/relapse rates, and outcome predictors. RESULTS: Prospective episode duration of manic diagnoses, using onset of mania as baseline date, was 79.2 +/- 66.7 consecutive weeks. Any bipolar disorder diagnosis occurred during 67.1% +/- 28.5% of total weeks, during the 209.4 +/- 3.3 weeks of follow-up. Subjects spent 56.9% +/- 28.8% of total weeks with mania or hypomania (unipolar or mixed), and 38.7% +/- 28.8% of these were with mania. Major or minor depression and dysthymia (unipolar or mixed) occurred during 47.1% +/- 30.4% of total weeks. Polarity switches occurred 1.1 +/- 0.7 times per year. Low maternal warmth predicted faster relapse after recovery from mania (chi(2) = 13.6, P =.0002), and psychosis predicted more weeks ill with mania or hypomania (F(1,80) = 12.2, P =.0008). Pubertal status and sex were not predictive. (Data are given as mean +/- SD.) CONCLUSIONS: These findings validate the existence, long-episode duration, and chronicity of child mania. Differences from the natural history of adult bipolar disorder are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpsyc.61.5.459

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 475

Metadata

Authors
Geller, B., Tillman, R., Craney, J. L., & Bolhofner, K.
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
2004-05-01
Volume
61
Issue
5
Pages
459
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2143882490
Cited by
475
References
7
FWCI
27.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Four-Year Prospective Outcome and Natural History of Mania in ChildrenWith a Prepubertal and Early Adolescent Bipolar Disorder Phenotype. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archpsyc.61.5.459
The paper
Geller, B., Tillman, R., Craney, J. L., & Bolhofner, K. (2004). Four-Year Prospective Outcome and Natural History of Mania in ChildrenWith a Prepubertal and Early Adolescent Bipolar Disorder Phenotype. Archives of General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.61.5.459

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.