The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predictors of Treatment Acceptance and Completion in Anorexia Nervosa: Implications for Future Study Designs
Abstract
CONTEXT: There have been very few randomized controlled treatment studies of anorexia nervosa. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate factors leading to nonacceptance and noncompletion of treatment for 2 specific therapies and their combination in the treatment of anorexia nervosa. DESIGN: Randomized prospective study. SETTING: Weill-Cornell Medical Center, White Plains, NY; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; and Stanford University, Stanford, Calif. Patients One hundred twenty-two patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for anorexia nervosa. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment with cognitive-behavioral therapy, fluoxetine hydrochloride, or their combination for 1 year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Dropout rate and acceptance of treatment (defined as staying in treatment at least 5 weeks). RESULTS: Of the 122 randomized cases, 21 (17%) were withdrawn; the overall dropout rate was 46% (56/122) in the remaining patients. Treatment acceptance occurred in 89 (73%) of the 122 randomized cases. Of the 41 assigned to medication alone, acceptance occurred in 23 (56%). In the other 2 groups, acceptance rate was differentiated by high and low obsessive preoccupation scores (rates of 91% and 60%, respectively). The only predictor of treatment completion was high self-esteem, which was associated with a 51% rate of treatment acceptance. CONCLUSION: Acceptance of treatment and relatively high dropout rates pose a major problem for research in the treatment of anorexia nervosa. Differing characteristics predict dropout rates and acceptance, which need to be carefully studied before comparative treatment trials are conducted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale: I. Development, Use, and Reliability
Goodman, W. K. (1989) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810110048007 · Cited by 7,712
The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger
Stunkard, A. J., & Messick, S. (1985) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(85)90010-8 · Cited by 4,687
Assessment of social adjustment by patient self report.
Weissman, M. M. (1976) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770090101010 · Cited by 1,782
Predictors of treatment utilization among women with anorexia and bulimia nervosa
Keel, P. K., Dorer, D. J., Eddy, K. T., Delinsky, S. S., Franko, D. L., Blais, M. A., Keller, M. B., & Herzog, D. B. (2002) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.1.140 · Cited by 62 · cited 3×
“(%) 13 (30) 12 (32) 15 (33) Cluster A 8 (7) 2 (5) 2 (5) Cluster B 11 (9) 8 (8) 8 (8) Cluster C 7 (16) 9 (26) 11 (29) Purging behavior, No.”
Cited by
New insights into symptoms and neurocircuit function of anorexia nervosa
Kaye, W. H., Fudge, J. L., & Paulus, M. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2682 · Cited by 843
Neurobiology of anorexia and bulimia nervosa
Kaye, W. (2008) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.11.037 · Cited by 625
The epidemiology of eating disorders in six European countries: results of the ESEMeD-WMH project.
Preti, A., Girolamo, G. D., Vilagut, G., Alonso, J., Graaf, R. D., Bruffaerts, R., Demyttenaere, K., Pinto-Meza, A., Haro, J. M., & Morosini, P. (2009) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.04.003 · Cited by 456
Anorexia nervosa treatment: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Bulik, C. M., Berkman, N. D., Brownley, K. A., Sedway, J. A., & Lohr, K. N. (2007) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.20367 · Cited by 427
Altered Reward Processing in Women Recovered From Anorexia Nervosa
Wagner, A., Aizenstein, H., Venkatraman, V. K., Fudge, J., May, J. C., Mazurkewicz, L., Frank, G. K., Bailer, U. F., Fischer, L., Nguyen, V., et al. (2007) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07040575 · Cited by 342
Metadata
- Authors
- Halmi, K. A., Agras, W. S., Crow, S., Mitchell, J., Wilson, G. T., Bryson, S. W., & Kraemer, H. C.
- Venue
- Archives of General Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2005-07-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 776
- ISSN
- 0003-990X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2033464619
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 16.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictors of Treatment Acceptance and Completion in Anorexia Nervosa: Implications for Future Study Designs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archpsyc.62.7.776
- The paper
- Halmi, K. A., Agras, W. S., Crow, S., Mitchell, J., Wilson, G. T., Bryson, S. W., & Kraemer, H. C. (2005). Predictors of Treatment Acceptance and Completion in Anorexia Nervosa: Implications for Future Study Designs. Archives of General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.7.776
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.