The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effective Treatment of Lymphedema of the Extremities
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To define the immediate and long-term volumetric reduction following complete decongestive physiotherapy (CDP) for lymphedema. DESIGN: Prospective study of consecutively treated patients. SETTING: Freestanding outpatient referral centers. PATIENTS: Two hundred ninety-nine patients referred for evaluation of lymphedema of the upper (2% primary, 98% secondary) or lower (61.3% primary, 38.7% secondary) extremities were treated with CDP for an average duration of 15.7 days. Lymphedema reduction was measured following completion of treatment and at 6- and 12-month follow-up visits. INTERVENTION: Complete decongestive physiotherapy is a 2-phase noninvasive therapeutic regimen. The first phase consists of manual lymphatic massage, multilayered inelastic compression bandaging, remedial exercises, and meticulous skin care. Phase 2 focuses on self-care by means of daytime elastic sleeve or stocking compression, nocturnal wrapping, and continued exercises. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Average limb volumes in milliliters were calculated prior to treatment, at the end of phase 1, and at 6- to 12-month intervals during phase 2 to assess percent volume reduction. RESULTS: Lymphedema reduction averaged 59.1% after upper-extremity CDP and 67.7% after lower-extremity treatment. With an average follow-up of 9 months, this improvement was maintained in compliant patients (86%) at 90% of the initial reduction for upper extremities and lower extremities. Noncompliant patients lost a part (33%) of their initial reduction. The incidence of infections decreased from 1.10 infections per patient per year to 0.65 infections per patient per year after a complete course of CDP. CONCLUSIONS: Complete decongestive physiotherapy is a highly effective treatment for both primary and secondary lymphedema. The initial reductions in volume achieved are maintained in the majority of the treated patients. These patients typically report a significant recovery from their previous cosmetic and functional impairments, and also from the psychosocial limitations they experienced from a physical stigma they felt was often trivialized by the medical and payor communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Care of girls and women with Turner syndrome: a guideline of the Turner syndrome study group
Bondy, C. A. (2007) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2006-1374 · Cited by 1,005
Arm edema in breast cancer patients
Erickson, V. S., Pearson, M. L., Ganz, P. A., Adams, J., & Kahn, K. L. (2001) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/93.2.96 · Cited by 560
Obesity and the skin: Skin physiology and skin manifestations of obesity
Yosipovitch, G., DeVore, A., & Dawn, A. (2007) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2006.12.004 · Cited by 524
Rockson, S. G. (2001) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00727-0 · Cited by 474
Lawenda, B. D., Mondry, T. E., & Johnstone, P. A. S. (2009) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20001 · Cited by 377
Metadata
- Authors
- Ko, D. S. C.
- Venue
- Archives of Surgery
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1998-04-01
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 452
- ISSN
- 0004-0010 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045902414
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effective Treatment of Lymphedema of the Extremities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archsurg.133.4.452
- The paper
- Ko, D. S. C. (1998). Effective Treatment of Lymphedema of the Extremities. Archives of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.133.4.452
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.