The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Tumors of the Pancreas Comprise 2 Clinical Subtypes: Differences in Clinical Characteristics and Surgical Management
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS: Intraductal papillary mucinous tumors (IPMTs) of the pancreas may be meaningfully construed as representing 2 clinically distinct subtypes: main duct tumors (MDT) and branch duct tumors (BDT). DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University hospital from January 1988 through December 1994. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: We reviewed diagnostic findings and late results of surgical treatment in 30 patients with IPMT. RESULTS: The tumor was located in the head of the pancreas more often in BDT than in MDT (65% [11/17] and 23% [3/13], respectively). Of the 13 patients with MDTs, 12 (92%) had intraductal papillary adenocarcinoma (noninvasive and minimally invasive types) and/or carcinoma in situ (carcinoma in situ: low papillary and/or flat tumor cells), and 3 (23%) had stromal invasion. Of the 17 patients with BDTs, 5 (29%) had intraductal papillary adenocarcinoma and/or carcinoma in situ. Two pancreatoduodenectomies and 8 pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomies were performed in 10 of the 17 patients with BDTs, distal pancreatectomy in 7 patients with MDTs, and total pancreatectomy in 4 patients with MDTs. The 5-year survival rates were 47% for MDT and 90% for BDT. Four of 6 patients with MDTs who died had local recurrence. One patient died of liver metastasis and 1 of esophageal cancer. Only 1 patient with BDT of the 2 who died had recurrent disease. CONCLUSIONS: Intraductal papillary mucinous tumors may be composed of 2 clinically distinct subtypes: MDTs and BDTs. Initially, although distal pancreatectomy can be recommended for most MDTs, the need for cancer-free margins in this more aggressive type may necessitate total pancreatectomy. Pylorus-perserving pancreatoduodenectomies is recommended for most BDTs, but, because these tumors are more often adenomas, a good prognosis can be expected.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hruban, R. H., Takaori, K., Klimstra, D. S., Adsay, N. V., Albores-Saavedra, J., Biankin, A. V., Biankin, S. A., Compton, C., Fukushima, N., Furukawa, T., et al. (2004) · American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/01.pas.0000126675.59108.80 · Cited by 1,091
Salvia, R., Castillo, C. F.-D., Bassi, C., Thayer, S. P., Falconi, M., Mantovani, W., Pederzoli, P., & Warshaw, A. L. (2004) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000124386.54496.15 · Cited by 746
Rodriguez, J. R., Salvia, R., Crippa, S., Warshaw, A. L., Bassi, C., Falconi, M., Thayer, S. P., Lauwers, G. Y., Capelli, P., Mino–Kenudson, M., et al. (2007) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.05.010 · Cited by 438
Scheiman, J. M., Hwang, J. H., & Moayyedi, P. (2015) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2015.01.014 · Cited by 437
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of pancreas
Machado, N., al Qadhi, H., & al Wahibi, K. (2015) · North American Journal of Medical Sciences · doi:10.4103/1947-2714.157477 · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Kobari, M.
- Venue
- Archives of Surgery
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1999-10-01
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1131
- ISSN
- 0004-0010 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2135621010
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Tumors of the Pancreas Comprise 2 Clinical Subtypes: Differences in Clinical Characteristics and Surgical Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archsurg.134.10.1131
- The paper
- Kobari, M. (1999). Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Tumors of the Pancreas Comprise 2 Clinical Subtypes: Differences in Clinical Characteristics and Surgical Management. Archives of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.134.10.1131
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.