The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perioperative Immunonutrition in Patients Undergoing Cancer Surgery: Results of a Randomized Double-blind Phase 3 Trial
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS: Perioperative administration of a supplemented enteral formula may reduce the rate of postoperative infections. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. SETTING: Department of surgery at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Two hundred six patients with neoplasm of colorectum, stomach, or pancreas. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to drink 1 L/d of either a control enteral formula (n = 104) or the same formula enriched with arginine, RNA, and omega3 fatty acids (n = 102) for 7 consecutive days before surgery. The 2 diets were isoenergetic and isonitrogenous. Jejunal infusion with the same formulas was started 6 hours after operation and continued until postoperative day 7. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate of postoperative infectious complications and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable for age, sex, weight loss, Karnofsky scale score, nutritional status, hemoglobin level, duration of surgery, blood loss, and rate of homologous transfusion. Intent-to-treat analysis showed a 14% (14/102) infectious complication rate in the supplemented group vs 30% (31/104) in the control group (P = .009). In the eligible population, the postoperative infection rate was 11% (9/85) in the supplemented group vs. 24% (21/86) in the control group (P = .02). The mean +/- SD length of postoperative stay was 11.1+/-4.4 days in the supplemented group and 12.9+/-4.6 in the control group (P = .01). CONCLUSION: Perioperative administration of a supplemented enteral formula significantly reduced postoperative infections and length of stay in patients undergoing surgery for cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The L-Arginine-Nitric Oxide Pathway
Epstein, F. H., Moncada, S., & Higgs, A. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199312303292706 · Cited by 6,678
Gianotti, L., Alexander, J. W., Gennari, R., Pyles, T., & Babcock, G. F. (1995) · Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · doi:10.1177/014860719501900169 · Cited by 194
Cited by
ESPEN guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery
Weimann, A., Braga, M., Carli, F., Higashiguchi, T., Hübner, M., Klek, S., Laviano, A., Ljungqvist, O., Lobo, D. N., Martindale, R., et al. (2017) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2017.02.013 · Cited by 1,881
Self-citationESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Surgery including Organ Transplantation
Weimann, A., Braga, M., Harsanyi, L., Laviano, A., Ljungqvist, O., Soeters, P., Jauch, K. W., Kemen, M., Hiesmayr, J. M., Horbach, T., et al. (2006) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2006.01.015 · Cited by 1,119
Self-citationHeyland, D. K., Novak, F., Drover, J. W., Jain, M., Su, X., & Suchner, U. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.286.8.944 · Cited by 907
Dietary modification of inflammation with lipids
Calder, P. C. (2002) · Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · doi:10.1079/pns2002166 · Cited by 485
Braga, M., Gianotti, L., Vignali, A., & Carlo, V. D. (2002) · Surgery · doi:10.1067/msy.2002.128350 · Cited by 405
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Braga, M.
- Venue
- Archives of Surgery
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1999-04-01
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 428
- ISSN
- 0004-0010 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2146331685
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perioperative Immunonutrition in Patients Undergoing Cancer Surgery: Results of a Randomized Double-blind Phase 3 Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archsurg.134.4.428
- The paper
- Braga, M. (1999). Perioperative Immunonutrition in Patients Undergoing Cancer Surgery: Results of a Randomized Double-blind Phase 3 Trial. Archives of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.134.4.428
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.