The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ten-Year Experience With 733 Pancreatic Resections: Changing Indications, Older Patients, and Decreasing Length of Hospitalization
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS: Experience with pancreatic resection for the last 10 years has resulted in new trends in patient characteristics and, for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), a decrease in the length of stay (LOS). This decrease is due in part to the implementation of case management and clinical pathways. DESIGN: Retrospective case series of patients undergoing pancreatic resection. SETTING: A university-affiliated, tertiary care referral center. PATIENTS: The study comprised 733 consecutive patients undergoing pancreatic resection for benign or malignant disease at the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston from April 1990 to March 2000. INTERVENTIONS: Of the 733 pancreatic resections, 489 were PD; 190, distal pancreatectomy; 40, total pancreatectomy; and 14, middle-segment pancreatectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Length of stay; occurrence of delayed gastric emptying, pancreatic fistula, reoperation, readmission, or other complications; mortality; and comparison of patients in 3 periods according to the implementation of case management (July 1995) and clinical pathways (September 1998). RESULTS: For PD, patients in group 1 (April 1990 to June 1995) were significantly younger (mean +/- SD, 57 +/- 15 years) than those in group 2 (July 1995 to August 1998; mean +/- SD, 62 +/- 13 years) and group 3 (September 1998 to October 2000; mean +/- SD, 65 +/- 13 years)(P <.01). Over time, the proportion of PD for cystic tumors increased from 9.9% to 20% (P =.01), and the proportion of PD for chronic pancreatitis decreased from 23% to 10% (P <.01). Use of pylorus-preserving PD decreased from 45% to 0% (P <.001). Delayed gastric emptying decreased from 17% to 6.1% (P <.01). Pancreatic fistula, reoperation, and mortality were unchanged. Length of stay for PD decreased from 16.1 +/- 0.6 to 9.5 +/- 0.4 days (mean +/- SE) (P <.001). Multivariate analysis showed that period, case volume, pylorus-preserving PD, and presence of complications are all independent predictors of LOS (P <.05 for all). For distal pancreatectomy, patients in groups 2 and 3 were older than those in group 1 (mean +/- SD, 57 +/-14 vs 52 +/- 17 years) (P <.05). Resections for cystic tumors increased from 26% to 52% (P <.05), and resections for chronic pancreatitis decreased from 32% to 14% (P =.06). Median LOS decreased from 9 days to 6. For total pancreatectomy, resections for cystic tumors increased from 18% to 43%. Median LOS decreased from 14.5 days to 11. For all resections, case volume increased from 4 resections per month in 1990 to 5.8 in 1995 and 12 in 2000 (r = 0.83; P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Older patients are increasingly being selected for pancreatic resection. This reflects an increasing frequency of operations performed for cystic tumors and fewer for chronic pancreatitis. With the exception of delayed gastric emptying, complications and mortality have remained the same or decreased slightly during the past 10 years. However, there has been a significant decrease in LOS; this is the result of implementation of case management and clinical pathways, increasing case volume, decreasing incidence of delayed gastric emptying, and decreasing use of pylorus-preserving PD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Impact of Sarcopenia on Outcomes Following Resection of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Peng, P., Hyder, O., Firoozmand, A., Kneuertz, P., Schulick, R. D., Huang, D., Makary, M., Hirose, K., Edil, B., Choti, M. A., et al. (2012) · Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11605-012-1923-5 · Cited by 546
Valsangkar, N. P., Morales-Oyarvide, V., Thayer, S. P., Ferrone, C. R., Wargo, J. A., Warshaw, A. L., & Fernández-del Castillo, C. (2012) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2012.05.033 · Cited by 418
Jais, B., Rebours, V, Malleo, G., Salvia, R., Fontana, M., Maggino, L., Bassi, C., Manfredi, R., Moran, R., Lennon, A. M., et al. (2016) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309638 · Cited by 372
Nikfarjam, M., Warshaw, A. L., Axelrod, L., Deshpande, V., Thayer, S. P., Ferrone, C. R., & Fernández-del Castillo, C. (2008) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e31815792ed · Cited by 221
Corral, J. E., Mareth, K. F., Riegert-Johnson, D. L., Das, A., & Wallace, M. B. (2019) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2018.04.065 · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Balcom IV, J. H.
- Venue
- Archives of Surgery
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2001-04-01
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 391
- ISSN
- 0004-0010 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053314500
- Cited by
- 769
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ten-Year Experience With 733 Pancreatic Resections: Changing Indications, Older Patients, and Decreasing Length of Hospitalization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archsurg.136.4.391
- The paper
- Balcom IV, J. H. (2001). Ten-Year Experience With 733 Pancreatic Resections: Changing Indications, Older Patients, and Decreasing Length of Hospitalization. Archives of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.136.4.391
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.