Cited by 546Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchNutrition and Health in AgingSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment

Impact of Sarcopenia on Outcomes Following Resection of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Open access
Peng, Peter, Hyder, Omar, Firoozmand, Amin, Kneuertz, Peter, Schulick, Richard D., Huang, Donghang, Makary, Martin, Hirose, Kenzo +6 more·2012·Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Introduction Assessing patient-specific risk factors for long-term mortality following resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma can be difficult. Sarcopenia--the measurement of muscle wasting--may be a more objective and comprehensive patient-specific factor associated with long-term survival. Methods Total psoas area (TPA) was measured on preoperative cross-sectional imaging in 557 patients undergoing resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 1996 and 2010. Sarcopenia was defined as the presence of a TPA in the lowest sex-specific quartile. The impact of sarcopenia on 90-day, 1-year, and 3-year mortality was assessed relative to other clinicopathological factors. Results Mean patient age was 65.7 years and 53.1 % was male. Mean TPA among men (611 mm²/m²) was greater than among women (454 mm²/m²). Surgery involved pancreaticoduodenectomy (86.0 %) or distal pancreatectomy (14.0 %). Mean tumor size was 3.4 cm; 49.9 % and 88.5 % of patients had vascular and perineural invasion, respectively. Margin status was R0 (59.0 %) and 77.7 % patients had lymph node metastasis. Overall 90-day mortality was 3.1 % and overall 1- and 3-year survival was 67.9 % and 35.7 %, respectively. Sarcopenia was associated with increased risk of 3-year mortality (HR = 1.68; P < 0.001). Tumor-specific factors such as poor differentiation on histology (HR = 1.75), margin status (HR = 1.66), and lymph node metastasis (HR = 2.06) were associated with risk of death at 3-years (all P < 0.001). After controlling for these factors, sarcopenia remained independently associated with an increased risk of death at 3 years (HR = 1.63; P < 0.001). Conclusions Sarcopenia was a predictor of survival following pancreatic surgery, with sarcopenic patients having a 63 % increased risk of death at 3 years. Sarcopenia was an objective measure of patient frailty that was strongly associated with long-term outcome independent of tumor-specific factors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11605-012-1923-5

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sarcopenia and fat loss are known components of the wasting syndrome of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and may have prognostic implications.

    “Indeed, sarcopenia and fat loss are known to be part of a wasting syndrome of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and might have prognostic implications.117,118”

    From Early detection of pancreatic cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [118]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peng, P., Hyder, O., Firoozmand, A., Kneuertz, P., Schulick, R. D., Huang, D., Makary, M., Hirose, K., Edil, B., Choti, M. A., Herman, J., Cameron, J. L., Wolfgang, C. L., & Pawlik, T. M.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Pawlik, Timothy M.
Venue
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
1478-1486
ISSN
1091-255X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043737378
Cited by
546
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
9.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P30CA006973)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
sarcopenia, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, pancreatic resection, postoperative mortality, long-term survival, patient frailty, prognostic factors, lymph node metastasis, margin status, tumor differentiation, sex differences, pancreaticoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy, muscle atrophy, preoperative imaging biomarkers, vascular invasion, perineural invasion
MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pancreatectomy, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Preoperative Care, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Survival Rate, Pancreaticoduodenectomy, Psoas Muscles, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Sarcopenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review