Impact of Sarcopenia on Outcomes Following Resection of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Open accessAbstract
Introduction Assessing patient-specific risk factors for long-term mortality following resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma can be difficult. Sarcopenia--the measurement of muscle wasting--may be a more objective and comprehensive patient-specific factor associated with long-term survival. Methods Total psoas area (TPA) was measured on preoperative cross-sectional imaging in 557 patients undergoing resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 1996 and 2010. Sarcopenia was defined as the presence of a TPA in the lowest sex-specific quartile. The impact of sarcopenia on 90-day, 1-year, and 3-year mortality was assessed relative to other clinicopathological factors. Results Mean patient age was 65.7 years and 53.1 % was male. Mean TPA among men (611 mm²/m²) was greater than among women (454 mm²/m²). Surgery involved pancreaticoduodenectomy (86.0 %) or distal pancreatectomy (14.0 %). Mean tumor size was 3.4 cm; 49.9 % and 88.5 % of patients had vascular and perineural invasion, respectively. Margin status was R0 (59.0 %) and 77.7 % patients had lymph node metastasis. Overall 90-day mortality was 3.1 % and overall 1- and 3-year survival was 67.9 % and 35.7 %, respectively. Sarcopenia was associated with increased risk of 3-year mortality (HR = 1.68; P < 0.001). Tumor-specific factors such as poor differentiation on histology (HR = 1.75), margin status (HR = 1.66), and lymph node metastasis (HR = 2.06) were associated with risk of death at 3-years (all P < 0.001). After controlling for these factors, sarcopenia remained independently associated with an increased risk of death at 3 years (HR = 1.63; P < 0.001). Conclusions Sarcopenia was a predictor of survival following pancreatic surgery, with sarcopenic patients having a 63 % increased risk of death at 3 years. Sarcopenia was an objective measure of patient frailty that was strongly associated with long-term outcome independent of tumor-specific factors.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sarcopenia and fat loss are known components of the wasting syndrome of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and may have prognostic implications.
“Indeed, sarcopenia and fat loss are known to be part of a wasting syndrome of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and might have prognostic implications.117,118”
From Early detection of pancreatic cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [118]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Goodpaster, B. H., Park, S. W., Harris, T. B., Kritchevsky, S. B., Nevitt, M., Schwartz, A. V., Simonsick, E. M., Tylavsky, F. A., Visser, M., Newman, A. B., et al. (2006) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/61.10.1059 · Cited by 3,083 · see citing works
Shen, W., Punyanitya, M., Wang, Z., Gallagher, D., St.-Onge, M.-P., Albu, J., Heymsfield, S. B., & Heshka, S. (2004) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00744.2004 · Cited by 1,692 · see citing works
Dodson, S., Baracos, V. E., Jatoi, A., Evans, W. J., Cella, D., Dalton, J. T., & Steiner, M. S. (2011) · Annual Review of Medicine · doi:10.1146/annurev-med-061509-131248 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: Opportunities and Challenges
Singhi, A. D., Koay, E. J., Chari, S. T., & Maitra, A. (2019) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.259 · Cited by 841 · see citing works
Early detection of pancreatic cancer
Pereira, S. P., Oldfield, L., Ney, A., Hart, P. A., Keane, M. G., Pandol, S. J., Li, D., Greenhalf, W., Jeon, C. Y., Koay, E. J., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30416-9 · Cited by 482 · see citing works
Impact of quality as well as quantity of skeletal muscle on outcomes after liver transplantation
Hamaguchi, Y., Kaido, T., Okumura, S., Fujimoto, Y., Ogawa, K., Mori, A., Hammad, A., Tamai, Y., Inagaki, N., & Uemoto, S. (2014) · Liver Transplantation · doi:10.1002/lt.23970 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Stretch, C., Aubin, J.-M., Mickiewicz, B., Leugner, D., Al-manasra, T., Tobola, E., Salazar, S., Sutherland, F. R., Ball, C. G., Dixon, E., et al. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196235 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Teigen, L. M., Kuchnia, A. J., Mourtzakis, M., & Earthman, C. P. (2017) · Nutrition in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1177/0884533616676264 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Pipek, L. Z., Baptista, C. G., Nascimento, R. F. V., Taba, J. V., Suzuki, M. O., do Nascimento, F. S., Martines, D. R., Nii, F., Iuamoto, L. R., Carneiro-D’Albuquerque, L. A., et al. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237740 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Systematic review and meta-analysis of lean mass and mortality: Rationale and study description
Cheung, C.-L., Lee, G. K.-Y., Au, P. C.-M., Li, G. H.-Y., Chan, M., Li, H.-L., Cheung, B. M.-Y., Wong, I. C.-K., Lee, V. H.-F., Mok, J., et al. (2021) · Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia · doi:10.1016/j.afos.2021.01.001 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Peng, P., Hyder, O., Firoozmand, A., Kneuertz, P., Schulick, R. D., Huang, D., Makary, M., Hirose, K., Edil, B., Choti, M. A., Herman, J., Cameron, J. L., Wolfgang, C. L., & Pawlik, T. M.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pawlik, Timothy M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1478-1486
- ISSN
- 1091-255X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3578313
- OpenAlex
- W2043737378
- Cited by
- 546
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 9.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (P30CA006973)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- sarcopenia, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, pancreatic resection, postoperative mortality, long-term survival, patient frailty, prognostic factors, lymph node metastasis, margin status, tumor differentiation, sex differences, pancreaticoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy, muscle atrophy, preoperative imaging biomarkers, vascular invasion, perineural invasion
- MeSH terms
- Adenocarcinoma, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pancreatectomy, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Preoperative Care, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Survival Rate, Pancreaticoduodenectomy, Psoas Muscles, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Sarcopenia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review