The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Clinical and Economic Correlates of Misdiagnosed Appendicitis: Nationwide Analysis
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Negative appendectomy (NA)--the nonincidental removal of a normal appendix--occurs commonly but the associated clinical- and system-level costs are not well studied. HYPOTHESIS: The frequency of adverse clinical outcomes and associated financial burden of hospitalizations during which NA is performed is greater than previously recognized and varies widely among demographic groups. DESIGN: Population-based, retrospective cohort study. SETTING: The 1997 Nationwide Inpatient Sample of the Health Care Utilization Project. PATIENTS: All surveyed patients assigned International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision procedure codes for appendectomy but without an associated diagnosis of acute appendicitis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The age- and sex-stratified rates of NA, the incidence of associated infectious complications and case fatality, and the average length of stay and hospitalization charges during those admissions. RESULTS: Nationwide, an estimated 261 134 patients underwent nonincidental appendectomies in 1997, and 39 901 (15.3%) were negative for appendicitis. Women had a higher rate of NA as did patients younger than 5 years and older than 60 years. When compared with patients with appendicitis, NA was associated with a significantly longer length of stay (5.8 vs 3.6 days, P<.001), total charge-admission ($18 780 vs $10 584, P<.001), case fatality rate (1.5% vs 0.2%, P<.001), and rate of infectious complications (2.6% vs 1.8%, P<.001). An estimated $741.5 million in total hospital charges resulted from admissions in which a NA was performed. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant clinical and financial costs incurred by patients undergoing NA during the treatment of presumed appendicitis. These should be considered when evaluating system-level interventions to improve the management of appendicitis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases
DEYO, R. (1992) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8 · Cited by 10,452
THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF APPENDICITIS AND APPENDECTOMY IN THE UNITED STATES
ADDISS, D. G., SHAFFER, N., FOWLER, B. S., & TAUXE, R. V. (1990) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115734 · Cited by 2,250
Has Misdiagnosis of Appendicitis Decreased Over Time?: A Population-Based Analysis
Flum, D. R., Morris, A., Koepsell, T., & Dellinger, E. P. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.286.14.1748 · Cited by 498
Self-citationIncidence of Acute Nonperforated and Perforated Appendicitis: Age‐specific and Sex‐specific Analysis
Körner, H., Söndenaa, K., Söreide, J. A., Andersen, E., Nysted, A., Lende, T. H., & Kjellevold, K. H. (1997) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s002689900235 · Cited by 458
Lee, S. L. (2001) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.136.5.556 · Cited by 300
Introduction of Appendiceal CT: Impact on Negative Appendectomy and Appendiceal Perforation Rates
Rao, P. M., Rhea, J. T., Rattner, D. W., Venus, L. G., & Novelline, R. A. (1999) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199903000-00007 · Cited by 282
Appendicitis: Why So Complicated? Analysis of 5755 Consecutive Appendectomies
Pittman-Waller, V. A., Myers, J. G., Stewart, R. M., Dent, D. L., Page, C. P., Gray, G. A., Pruitt, B. A., & Root, H. D. (2000) · The American Surgeon · doi:10.1177/000313480006600605 · Cited by 162
High negative appendectomy rates are no longer acceptable
Colson, M., Skinner, K. A., & Dunnington, G. L. (1997) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0002-9610(97)00183-9 · Cited by 146
Weyant, M. J., Eachempati, S. R., Maluccio, M. A., et al. (2000) · Surgery · doi:10.1067/msy.2000.107422 · Cited by 106
Cited by
Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020
Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., Goding Sauer, A., Fedewa, S. A., Butterly, L. F., Anderson, J. C., Cercek, A., Smith, R. A., & Jemal, A. (2020) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21601 · Cited by 4,880
Imaging Patients with Acute Abdominal Pain
Stoker, J., van Randen, A., Laméris, W., & Boermeester, M. A. (2009) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2531090302 · Cited by 431
Andersson, R. E. (2007) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-006-0056-y · Cited by 351
Yu, C.-W., Juan, L.-I., Wu, M.-H., Shen, C.-J., Wu, J.-Y., & Lee, C.-C. (2013) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.9008 · Cited by 351
Racial Trends in the Use of Major Procedures among the Elderly
Jha, A. K., Fisher, E. S., Li, Z., Orav, E. J., & Epstein, A. M. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa050672 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Flum, D. R., & Koepsell, T.
- Venue
- Archives of Surgery
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2002-07-01
- Volume
- 137
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 799-804; discussion 804
- ISSN
- 0004-0010 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995713651
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 13.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Clinical and Economic Correlates of Misdiagnosed Appendicitis: Nationwide Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archsurg.137.7.799
- The paper
- Flum, D. R., & Koepsell, T. (2002). The Clinical and Economic Correlates of Misdiagnosed Appendicitis: Nationwide Analysis. Archives of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.137.7.799
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.