The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Appendicitis: Why So Complicated? Analysis of 5755 Consecutive Appendectomies
Abstract
A perceived high rate of complicated (gangrenous or perforated) appendicitis, despite advances in laboratory and radiographic diagnostic modalities, prompted a review of our experience with appendicitis followed by a prospective analysis that examined the time course from presentation to definitive treatment in 218 consecutive patients. In 5755 appendectomies, our overall rate of complicated appendicitis was 32 per cent; higher in males, in the young, and in the elderly; and relatively stable over each year reviewed. Prospectively, we determined that of the various time intervals, the time from the onset of symptoms to first seeking medical attention is the only significant predictor of complicated appendicitis (39.8 vs 16.5 hours for acute appendicitis). On the other hand, the time from surgical evaluation to operative intervention was significantly shorter for complicated appendicitis (3.8 vs 4.7 hours for acute appendicitis). The high rate of complicated appendicitis with its subsequent sequelae of increased morbidity and resource expenditure is primarily the direct result of patient delay in seeking medical attention and not the result of diagnostic dilemma or surgical delay. Public education, specifically targeting those groups at risk, may provide a substantial and significant solution to the complicated appendix.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Has Misdiagnosis of Appendicitis Decreased Over Time?: A Population-Based Analysis
Flum, D. R., Morris, A., Koepsell, T., & Dellinger, E. P. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.286.14.1748 · Cited by 498
The Clinical and Economic Correlates of Misdiagnosed Appendicitis: Nationwide Analysis
Flum, D. R., & Koepsell, T. (2002) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.137.7.799 · Cited by 411
Andersson, R. E. (2007) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-006-0056-y · Cited by 351
The value of telephone triage for patients with appendicitis
North, F., Odunukan, O., & Varkey, P. (2011) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1258/jtt.2011.110301 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Pittman-Waller, V. A., Myers, J. G., Stewart, R. M., Dent, D. L., Page, C. P., Gray, G. A., Pruitt, B. A., & Root, H. D.
- Venue
- The American Surgeon
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 548-554
- ISSN
- 0003-1348 (ISSN-L)
- 1555-9823
- OpenAlex
- W121738789
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Appendicitis: Why So Complicated? Analysis of 5755 Consecutive Appendectomies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/000313480006600605
- The paper
- Pittman-Waller, V. A., Myers, J. G., Stewart, R. M., Dent, D. L., Page, C. P., Gray, G. A., Pruitt, B. A., & Root, H. D. (2000). Appendicitis: Why So Complicated? Analysis of 5755 Consecutive Appendectomies. The American Surgeon. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313480006600605
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.