The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Use of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Major Surgery: Baseline Results From the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a major contributor to patient injury, mortality, and health care costs. Despite evidence of effectiveness of antimicrobials to prevent SSIs, previous studies have demonstrated inappropriate timing, selection, and excess duration of administration of antimicrobial prophylaxis. We herein describe the use of antimicrobial prophylaxis for Medicare patients undergoing major surgery. DESIGN: National retrospective cohort study with medical record review. SETTING: Two thousand nine hundred sixty-five acute-care US hospitals. PATIENTS: A systematic random sample of 34,133 Medicare inpatients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting; other open-chest cardiac surgery (excluding transplantation); vascular surgery, including aneurysm repair, thromboendarterectomy, and vein bypass operations; general abdominal colorectal surgery; hip and knee total joint arthroplasty (excluding revision surgery); and abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy from January 1 through November 30, 2001. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of patients who had parenteral antimicrobial prophylaxis initiated within 1 hour before the surgical incision; the proportion of patients who were given a prophylactic antimicrobial agent that was consistent with currently published guidelines; and the proportion of patients whose antimicrobial prophylaxis was discontinued within 24 hours after surgery. RESULTS: An antimicrobial dose was administered to 55.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 54.8%-56.6%) of patients within 1 hour before incision. Antimicrobial agents consistent with published guidelines were administered to 92.6% (95% CI, 92.3%-92.8%) of the patients. Antimicrobial prophylaxis was discontinued within 24 hours of surgery end time for only 40.7% (95% CI, 40.2%-41.2%) of patients. CONCLUSION: Substantial opportunities exist to improve the use of prophylactic antimicrobials for patients undergoing major surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
Baker, A. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7322.1192 · Cited by 10,736
Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999
Mangram, A. J., Horan, T. C., Pearson, M. L., Silver, L. C., Jarvis, W. R., & The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (1999) · Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology · doi:10.1086/501620 · Cited by 4,595
System, A. R. F. T. N. (2003) · American Journal of Infection Control · doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2003.09.002 · Cited by 2,915
Disseminating Innovations in Health Care
Berwick, D. M. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.15.1969 · Cited by 1,878
The Timing of Prophylactic Administration of Antibiotics and the Risk of Surgical-Wound Infection
Classen, D. C., Evans, R. S., Pestotnik, S. L., Horn, S. D., Menlove, R. L., & Burke, J. P. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199201303260501 · Cited by 1,739
Kirkland, K. B., Briggs, J. P., Trivette, S. L., Wilkinson, W. E., & Sexton, D. J. (1999) · Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology · doi:10.1086/501572 · Cited by 1,714
The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions.
Burke, J. F. (1961) · PubMed · Cited by 1,284
A Computer-Assisted Management Program for Antibiotics and Other Antiinfective Agents
Evans, R. S., Pestotnik, S. L., Classen, D. C., Clemmer, T. P., Weaver, L. K., Orme, J. F., Lloyd, J. F., & Burke, J. P. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199801223380406 · Cited by 1,061
Engemann, J. J., Carmeli, Y., Cosgrove, S. E., Fowler, V. G., Bronstein, M. Z., Trivette, S. L., Briggs, J. P., Sexton, D. J., & Kaye, K. S. (2003) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/367653 · Cited by 934
Whitehouse, J. D., Friedman, N. D., Kirkland, K. B., Richardson, W. J., & Sexton, D. J. (2002) · Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology · doi:10.1086/502033 · Cited by 926
Cited by
Antibiotic prophylaxis for wound infections in total joint arthroplasty: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
AlBuhairan, B., Hind, D., & Hutchinson, A. (2008) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.90b7.20498 · Cited by 284
Adherence to Surgical Care Improvement Project Measures and Post-Operative Surgical Site Infections
Awad, S. S. (2012) · Surgical Infections · doi:10.1089/sur.2012.131 · Cited by 280
Kritchevsky, S. B., Braun, B. I., Bush, A. J., Bozikis, M. R., Kusek, L., Burke, J. P., Wong, E. S., Jernigan, J., Davis, C. C., Simmons, B., et al. (2008) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-149-7-200810070-00007 · Cited by 61
The Apache Study Group, Giusti, A., Spila Alegiani, S., Ciofi degli Atti, M. L., Colaceci, S., Raschetti, R., Arace, P., Spiazzi, R., & Raponi, M. (2016) · BMC Pediatrics · doi:10.1186/s12887-016-0739-y · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Bratzler, D. W.
- Venue
- Archives of Surgery
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2005-02-01
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 174
- ISSN
- 0004-0010 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2058104808
- Cited by
- 578
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 37.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Major Surgery: Baseline Results From the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archsurg.140.2.174
- The paper
- Bratzler, D. W. (2005). Use of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Major Surgery: Baseline Results From the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Archives of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.140.2.174
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.