The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Outcomes of Preoperative Weight Loss in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Gastric Bypass Surgery
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS: Modest, preoperative weight loss will improve perioperative outcomes among high-risk, morbidly obese patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. DESIGN: A prospective, longitudinal assessment of characteristics and outcomes of gastric bypass patients. SETTING: All patients undergoing open or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery for morbid obesity or its comorbid medical problems at Geisinger Medical Center in Danville, Pennsylvania, during a 3-year period from May 31, 2002, to February 24, 2006, were included in this analysis. Patients were required to participate in a standardized multidisciplinary preoperative program that encompasses medical, psychological, nutritional, and surgical interventions and education. In addition, patients were encouraged to achieve a 10% loss of excess body weight prior to surgical intervention. RESULTS: Of the 884 subjects, 425 (48%) lost more than 10% of their excess body weight prior to the operation. After surgery (mean follow-up, 12 months), this group was more likely to achieve 70% loss of excess body weight (P < .001). Those who lost more than 5% of excess body weight prior to surgery were statistically less likely to have a length of stay of greater than 4 days (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that high-risk morbidly obese candidates for bariatric surgery who are able to achieve a loss of 5% to 10% excess body weight prior to surgery have a higher probability of a shorter length of hospital stay and more rapid postoperative weight loss.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Buchwald, H., Avidor, Y., Braunwald, E., Jensen, M. D., Pories, W., Fahrbach, K., & Schoelles, K. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.292.14.1724 · Cited by 6,800
Cited by
De Hert, S., Staender, S., Fritsch, G., Hinkelbein, J., Afshari, A., Bettelli, G., Bock, M., Chew, M. S., Coburn, M., De Robertis, E., et al. (2018) · European Journal of Anaesthesiology · doi:10.1097/eja.0000000000000817 · Cited by 389
Mechanick, J. I., Kushner, R. F., Sugerman, H. J., Gonzalez‐Campoy, J. M., Collazo‐Clavell, M. L., Spitz, A. F., Apovian, C. M., Livingston, E. H., Brolin, R., Sarwer, D. B., et al. (2009) · Obesity · doi:10.1038/oby.2009.28 · Cited by 345
Schouten, R., Rijs, C. S., Bouvy, N. D., Hameeteman, W., Koek, G. H., Janssen, I. M. C., & Greve, J.-W. M. (2010) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3181bdfbff · Cited by 279
Effect of preoperative weight loss in bariatric surgical patients: a systematic review
Cassie, S., Menezes, C., Birch, D. W., Shi, X., & Karmali, S. (2011) · Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.soard.2011.08.011 · Cited by 160
Psychological predictors of weight loss after bariatric surgery: A review of the recent research
Wimmelmann, C. L., Dela, F., & Mortensen, E. L. (2014) · Obesity Research & Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.orcp.2013.09.003 · Cited by 151
Metadata
- Authors
- Still, C. D.
- Venue
- Archives of Surgery
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2007-10-01
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 994
- ISSN
- 0004-0010 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2138321289
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outcomes of Preoperative Weight Loss in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Gastric Bypass Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archsurg.142.10.994
- The paper
- Still, C. D. (2007). Outcomes of Preoperative Weight Loss in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Gastric Bypass Surgery. Archives of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.142.10.994
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.