Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Role of Whole-Body Positron Emission Tomography With [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose in Identifying Operable Colorectal Cancer Metastases to the Liver

Lai, David T. M.·1996·Archives of Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of whole-body position emission tomography (PET)using [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) with conventional radiological imaging techniques in identifying operable colorectal cancer metastases to the liver. DESIGN: A double-blind comparative study of FDG-PET as the criterion standard vs conventional radiological imaging methods as the criterion standard, in staging of recurrent colorectal cancer. SETTING: Institutional practice in a tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Thirty-four consecutive patients with suspected colorectal cancer metastases recruited for the study between May 1993 and October 1994. INTERVENTIONS: Conventional radiological methods of cancer staging included abdominal computed tomography (CT) (n = 34), chest x-rays (n = 15), and chest CT (n = 19) to evaluate extrahepatic disease. Twenty-seven patients were subsequently considered to have apparently isolated cancer metastases to the liver. Anatomical resectability was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (n = 24) or CT angiography (n = 3) in all study patients. The FDG-PET studies (n = 34) were performed within 8 weeks of conventional radiological imaging. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Malignancy of suspected lesions detected by means of FDG-PET and conventional radiological imaging was confirmed by histopathologic examination of resected specimens and percutaneous biopsy specimens and by serial CT scans demonstrating progression of disease. RESULTS: Unsuspected extrahepatic malignant disease that was missed by conventional radiological imaging was detected by FDG-PET in 11 patients (32%). The PET-detected extrahepatic malignant disease included retroperitoneal nodal metastases (n = 6), pulmonary metastases (n = 3), and locoregional cancer recurrences (n = 2). The additional information afforded by PET consequently had an influence on the clinical management in 10 patients (29%). CONCLUSIONS: The FDG-PET method enabled selection of patients with apparently curable colorectal cancer metastases to the liver for hepatic resection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430190025007

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 254

Metadata

Authors
Lai, D. T. M.
Venue
Archives of Surgery
Published
1996-07-01
Volume
131
Issue
7
Pages
703
ISSN
0004-0010 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992317954
Cited by
254
References
11
FWCI
8.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Role of Whole-Body Positron Emission Tomography With [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose in Identifying Operable Colorectal Cancer Metastases to the Liver. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430190025007
The paper
Lai, D. T. M. (1996). The Role of Whole-Body Positron Emission Tomography With [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose in Identifying Operable Colorectal Cancer Metastases to the Liver. Archives of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430190025007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.