The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Role of Whole-Body Positron Emission Tomography With [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose in Identifying Operable Colorectal Cancer Metastases to the Liver
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of whole-body position emission tomography (PET)using [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) with conventional radiological imaging techniques in identifying operable colorectal cancer metastases to the liver. DESIGN: A double-blind comparative study of FDG-PET as the criterion standard vs conventional radiological imaging methods as the criterion standard, in staging of recurrent colorectal cancer. SETTING: Institutional practice in a tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Thirty-four consecutive patients with suspected colorectal cancer metastases recruited for the study between May 1993 and October 1994. INTERVENTIONS: Conventional radiological methods of cancer staging included abdominal computed tomography (CT) (n = 34), chest x-rays (n = 15), and chest CT (n = 19) to evaluate extrahepatic disease. Twenty-seven patients were subsequently considered to have apparently isolated cancer metastases to the liver. Anatomical resectability was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (n = 24) or CT angiography (n = 3) in all study patients. The FDG-PET studies (n = 34) were performed within 8 weeks of conventional radiological imaging. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Malignancy of suspected lesions detected by means of FDG-PET and conventional radiological imaging was confirmed by histopathologic examination of resected specimens and percutaneous biopsy specimens and by serial CT scans demonstrating progression of disease. RESULTS: Unsuspected extrahepatic malignant disease that was missed by conventional radiological imaging was detected by FDG-PET in 11 patients (32%). The PET-detected extrahepatic malignant disease included retroperitoneal nodal metastases (n = 6), pulmonary metastases (n = 3), and locoregional cancer recurrences (n = 2). The additional information afforded by PET consequently had an influence on the clinical management in 10 patients (29%). CONCLUSIONS: The FDG-PET method enabled selection of patients with apparently curable colorectal cancer metastases to the liver for hepatic resection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
FORTNER, J. G., SILVA, J. S., GOLBEY, R. B., COX, E. B., & MACLEAN, B. J. (1984) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-198403000-00010 · Cited by 532
Resection of Hepatic Metastases from Colorectal Cancer Biologic Perspectives
STEELE, G., & RAVIKUMAR, T. S. (1989) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-198908000-00001 · Cited by 525
Hughes, K. S., Rosenstein, R. B., Songhorabodi, S., Adson, M. A., Ilstrup, D. M., Fortner, J. G., Maclean, B. J., Foster, J. H., Daly, J. M., Fitzherbert, D., et al. (1988) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1007/bf02552560 · Cited by 383
Shirlaw, J. T. (1931) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.1.3653.74-a · Cited by 363
Recurrence of colorectal tumors: PET evaluation.
Strauss, L. G., Clorius, J. H., Schlag, P., Lehner, B., Kimmig, B., Engenhart, R., Marin-Grez, M., Helus, F., Oberdorfer, F., & Schmidlin, P. (1989) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.170.2.2783494 · Cited by 268
Occult hepatic metastases in colorectal carcinoma
Finlay, I. G., & McArdle, C. S. (1986) · British journal of surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800730918 · Cited by 235
Lewis, P. J., Marsden, P. K., Gee, A. D., NUNAN, T. O., Malsey, M., Griffin, S., & Dussek, J. E. (1994) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90753-6 · Cited by 208
Whole-body positron emission tomography: Part I. Methods and performance characteristics.
Dahlbom, M. L., Hoffman, E. J., Hoh, C. K., Schiepers, C. W., Rosenqvist, G., Hawkins, R. A., & Phelps, M. E. (1992) · PubMed · Cited by 199
Beets, G., Penninckx, F., Schiepers, C., Filez, L., Mortelmans, L., Kerremans, R., Aerts, R., & De Rao, M. (1994) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800811136 · Cited by 181
Optimum scanning protocol for FDG-PET evaluation of pulmonary malignancy
Lowe, V. J. (1995) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/0169-5002(95)90601-0 · Cited by 133
Cited by
Resection of colorectal liver metastases
Scheele, J., Stang, R., Altendorf‐Hofmann, A., & Paul, M. (1995) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/bf00316981 · Cited by 1,539
(2001) · PubMed · Cited by 943
Blodgett, T. M., Meltzer, C. C., & Townsend, D. W. (2007) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2422051113 · Cited by 387
Evaluation of Benign vs Malignant Hepatic Lesions With Positron Emission Tomography
Delbeke, D. (1998) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.133.5.510 · Cited by 312
PET and PET-CT for evaluation of colorectal carcinoma
Delbeke, D., & Martin, W. H. (2004) · Seminars in Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2004.03.006 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Lai, D. T. M.
- Venue
- Archives of Surgery
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1996-07-01
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 703
- ISSN
- 0004-0010 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992317954
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 8.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Role of Whole-Body Positron Emission Tomography With [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose in Identifying Operable Colorectal Cancer Metastases to the Liver. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430190025007
- The paper
- Lai, D. T. M. (1996). The Role of Whole-Body Positron Emission Tomography With [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose in Identifying Operable Colorectal Cancer Metastases to the Liver. Archives of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430190025007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.