The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: Comparison of the Lateral and Posterior Approaches
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the lateral transabdominal and posterior retroperitoneal laparoscopic methods for performing adrenalectomy. DESIGN: Nonrandomized. SETTING: Hospitals affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco. PATIENTS: Thirty-six patients (15 men and 21 women), aged 5 to 78 years (mean age, 49 years), were treated for the following conditions: aldosteronoma, 18 patients; pheochromocytoma, 4 patients; Cushing syndrome, 6 patients; androgen-secreting tumor, 1 patient; nonfunctioning adenoma, 3 patients; adrenal hemorrhage, 1 patient; metastatic neoplasm, 2 patients; and myelolipoma, 1 patient. INTERVENTIONS: Twenty-three lateral and 14 posterior laparoscopic adrenalectomies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Success rate, operating time, complications, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: The tumors, which ranged in size from 1 to 13 cm (mean, 4.2 cm; median, 2.5 cm), were all successfully resected laparoscopically. All 8 tumors larger than 6 cm were resected by the lateral approach. One critically ill patient died. No patient required blood transfusions or conversion to laparotomy. Mean operating time was 3.8 hours vs 3.4 hours (median, 3.5 hours vs 3 hours) and mean hospital stay was 2.2 days vs 1.5 days (median, 2 days vs 1 day) for the lateral and posterior approaches, respectively. All patients without concomitant procedures were ready to be discharged within 48 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Both approaches were effective and safe. We prefer the lateral approach for tumors larger than 6 cm and the posterior approach for bilateral tumors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The clinically inapparent adrenal mass: update in diagnosis and management
Mansmann, G., Lau, J., Balk, E., Rothberg, M., Miyachi, Y., & Bornstein, S. R. (2004) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2002-0031 · Cited by 781
Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: Lessons Learned From 100 Consecutive Procedures
Gagner, M., Pomp, A., Heniford, B. T., Pharand, D., & Lacroix, A. (1997) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199709000-00003 · Cited by 593
Laparoscopic versus open posterior adrenalectomy: A case-control study of 100 patients
Thompson, G. B., Grant, C. S., van Heerden, J. A., Schlinkert, R. T., Young, W. F., Farley, D. R., & Ilstrup, D. M. (1997) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0039-6060(97)90218-x · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Duh, Q.-Y.
- Venue
- Archives of Surgery
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1996-08-01
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 870
- ISSN
- 0004-0010 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043060647
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: Comparison of the Lateral and Posterior Approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430200080014
- The paper
- Duh, Q.-Y. (1996). Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: Comparison of the Lateral and Posterior Approaches. Archives of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430200080014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.