The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: Preliminary Results From a Prospective Analysis of 1194 Laparoscopic-Assisted Colectomies
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy is an emerging technology for patients with cancer, polyps, inflammation, and other types of pathologic conditions. While previous studies have shown better outcomes for laparoscopic cholecystectomies when surgeons perform more procedures, there is no information on the relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes for laparoscopic-assisted colectomy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether better clinical outcomes are found for surgeons who perform higher numbers of laparoscopic-assisted colectomies and whether such a relationship, if it exists, applies to both intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. DESIGN: Analysis of a data set of 1194 patients, operated on by 114 surgeons, from a prospective registry sponsored by the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, from May 1991 to October 1994. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Completion rate, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: In 75% of cases, surgery was completed laparoscopically, with no difference between high-volume surgeons (> or = 40 cases) and low-volume surgeons. Length of stay (average, 6 days) did not vary according to surgeon volume. Postoperative complications occurred in 15% of cases, with a significantly lower rate for high-volume surgeons (10% vs 19%; P < .001). Intraoperative complications occurred in 5% of cases, with a nonsignificant trend toward a lower rate for high-volume surgeons (3.7% vs 6.3%). A multivariate regression analysis, adjusting for type of disease (cancer vs inflammation vs polyps) and for level of difficulty of the procedure (high vs low) showed that for high-volume surgeons there is a lower probability of both intraoperative complications (adjusted odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.97; P = .04) and postoperative complications (adjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.68; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: There is a learning curve for laparoscopic-assisted colectomy with respect to intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. As with other laparoscopic procedures, surgeons who perform higher volumes of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy have lower rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tekkis, P. P., Senagore, A. J., Delaney, C. P., & Fazio, V. W. (2005) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000167857.14690.68 · Cited by 745
Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections
Schlachta, C. M., Mamazza, J., Seshadri, P. A., Cadeddu, M., Gregoire, R., & Poulin, E. C. (2001) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1007/bf02234296 · Cited by 422
Statistical assessment of the learning curves of health technologies
Ramsay, C. R., Grant, A. M., Wallace, S. A., Garthwaite, P. H., Monk, A. F., & Russell, I. T. (2001) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta5120 · Cited by 353
Anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: The impact of fibrin glue
Huh, J. W., Kim, H. R., & Kim, Y. J. (2010) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.01.018 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennett, C. L.
- Venue
- Archives of Surgery
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1997-01-01
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41
- ISSN
- 0004-0010 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068678946
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: Preliminary Results From a Prospective Analysis of 1194 Laparoscopic-Assisted Colectomies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430250043009
- The paper
- Bennett, C. L. (1997). The Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: Preliminary Results From a Prospective Analysis of 1194 Laparoscopic-Assisted Colectomies. Archives of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430250043009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.