Cited by 126Thyroid and Parathyroid SurgeryThyroid Disorders and TreatmentsThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Outcomes Following Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery in Pregnant Women

Kuy, SreyRam·2009·Archives of Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To perform the first population-based measurement of clinical and economic outcomes after thyroid and parathyroid surgery in pregnant women and identify the characteristics of this population and the predictors of outcome. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. SETTING: Health Care Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS), a 20% sample of nonfederal US hospitals. PATIENTS: All pregnant women, compared with age-matched nonpregnant women, who underwent thyroid and parathyroid procedures from 1999 to 2005. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fetal, maternal, and surgical complications, in-hospital mortality, median length of stay, and hospital costs. RESULTS: A total of 201 pregnant women underwent thyroid (n = 165) and parathyroid (n = 36) procedures and were examined together. The mean age was 29 years, 60% were white, 25% were emergent or urgent admissions, and 46% had thyroid cancer. Compared with nonpregnant women (n = 31 155), pregnant patients had a higher rate of endocrine (15.9 vs 8.1%; P < .001) and general complications (11.4 vs 3.6%; P < .001), longer unadjusted lengths of stay (2 days vs 1 day; P < .001), and higher unadjusted hospital costs ($6873 vs $5963; P = .007). The fetal and maternal complication rates were 5.5% and 4.5%, respectively. On multivariate regression analysis, pregnancy was an independent predictor of higher combined surgical complications (odds ratio, 2; P < .001), longer adjusted length of stay (0.3 days longer; P < .001), and higher adjusted hospital costs ($300; P < .001). Other independent predictors of outcome were surgeon volume, patient race or ethnicity, and insurance status. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women have worse clinical and economic outcomes following thyroid and parathyroid surgery than nonpregnant women, with disparities in outcomes based on race, insurance, and access to high-volume surgeons.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archsurg.2009.48

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 126

Authors
Kuy, S.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Kuy, SreyRam
Venue
Archives of Surgery
Published
2009-05-18
Volume
144
Issue
5
Pages
399
ISSN
0004-0010 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056733459
Cited by
126
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
13.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
thyroid surgery, parathyroidectomy, pregnancy, surgical complications, fetal complications, maternal complications, in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, hospital costs, surgeon volume, racial disparities, insurance status, thyroid cancer, endocrine complications
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Length of Stay, Parathyroid Diseases, Pregnancy, Regression Analysis, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Thyroid Diseases, Chi-Square Distribution, Treatment Outcome, Hospital Mortality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review