Cited by 58Medical and Biological SciencesHealthcare Systems and Public HealthCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Nomenclature and Criteria for Diagnosis of Diseases of the Heart and Blood Vessels

·1953·Journal of the American Medical Association

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1953.02940260115033

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The concept that a 'normal rate' must be 60-100 bpm is, by most accounts, a construct 'for convenience and for uniformity' as determined by expert consensus.

    “The concept that a “normal rate” must be 60–100 bpm is, by most accounts, a construct “for convenience and for uniformity”7 as determined by expert consensus.8”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
Journal of the American Medical Association
Published
1953-10-31
Volume
153
Issue
9
Pages
891
ISSN
0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4254062485
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
JAMA (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Medical and Biological Sciences
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Keywords
cardiovascular disease, disease nomenclature, diagnostic criteria, heart disease, blood vessel diseases, vascular disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review