Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prognostic Importance of Premature Beats Following Myocardial Infarction: Experience in the Coronary Drug Project

·1973·JAMA

Abstract

Two hundred thirty-five men among 2,035 survivors of myocardial infarction (11.5%) had one or more ventricular premature beats (VPB) in their resting base-line electrocardiogram. During a three-year follow-up period, deaths were about twice as frequent in those with any VPB (21.7%) as in those with none (11.4%) among the placebo-treated patients in the nationwide Coronary Drug Project. Excess long-term risk of death, including sudden death, was associated with the frequency of VPB, with VPB in pairs or runs, and possibly with early-cycle VPB. The excess risk with these VPB characteristics was independent of the risk associated with other electrocardiographic and clinical characteristics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1973.03220100016005

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Venue
JAMA
Published
1973-03-05
Volume
223
Issue
10
Pages
1116
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2973517509
Cited by
267
References
0
FWCI
14.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic Importance of Premature Beats Following Myocardial Infarction: Experience in the Coronary Drug Project. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1973.03220100016005
The paper
Prognostic Importance of Premature Beats Following Myocardial Infarction: Experience in the Coronary Drug Project. (1973). JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1973.03220100016005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.