Cited by 3Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasCoffee research and impactsCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments

Caffeine and Ventricular Arrhythmias: An Electrophysiological Approach

Chelsky, Linda B.·1990·JAMA

Abstract

Little information is known regarding caffeine's effect on the substrate supporting sustained ventricular arrhythmias. This prospective study evaluated the effect of coffee (275 mg of caffeine) on this substrate with programmed ventricular stimulation in 22 patients with a history of symptomatic nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular tachycardia, or ventricular fibrillation. Patients under-went electrophysiological testing before and 1 hour after coffee ingestion. Mean ( ± SEM) plasma caffeine level achieved after coffee consumption was 6.2 ± 0.5 mg/L. Mean plasma catecholamine and potassium values were not altered significantly 1 hour following caffeine ingestion. The number of extrastimuli required to induce an arrhythmia was unchanged in 10 patients (46%), increased in six (27%), and decreased in six (27%). Rhythm severity was unchanged in 17 patients (77%), more severe in two (9%), and less severe in three (14%). In those patients with clinical ventricular arrhythmias, caffeine did not significantly alter inducibility or severity of arrhythmias, suggesting little effect on the substrate supporting ventricular arrhythmias. (JAMA. 1990;264:2236-2240)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1990.03450170084027

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At typical caffeine doses, studies have documented mild changes in heart rate and blood pressure, a slight increase in sympathetic activity, and small changes in cardiac electrophysiological properties.

    “At typical caffeine doses, however, studies have documented mild changes in heart rate and blood pressure, a slight increase in sympathetic activity, and small changes in cardiac electrophysiological properties (105, 108–110).”

    From The Safety of Ingested Caffeine: A Comprehensive Review (2017) · cites this paper as [108]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chelsky, L. B.
Corresponding author
Chelsky, Linda B.
Venue
JAMA
Published
1990-11-07
Volume
264
Issue
17
Pages
2236
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2600916148
Cited by
3
References
2
Citations by year
2016: 1
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
JAMA (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Keywords
caffeine, ventricular arrhythmias, coffee, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, programmed ventricular stimulation, arrhythmia inducibility, arrhythmogenic substrate, catecholamines, potassium

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review