The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Prospective Study of Benign Breast Disease and the Risk of Breast Cancer
Abstract
Objective. —To examine the relation between proliferative benign breast disease with and without atypical hyperplasia and the subsequent risk of breast cancer. Design. —Case-control study nested within a prospective cohort study. Median follow-up after breast biopsy was 8 years (25th to 75th percentile, 5 to 14 years). Participants. —Selected from a prospective cohort of 121 700 US registered nurses followed up from 1976 to 1986. Cases were women with breast cancer who had a prior biopsy for benign breast disease. Controls were randomly selected and matched on year of biopsy and year of birth from among women in the cohort who had a benign breast biopsy but who did not develop breast cancer. Included in the analysis were 121 cases and 488 controls. Main Outcome Measure. —Development of breast cancer. Results. —Slides from the first benign breast biopsy were reviewed by two breast pathologists blinded to the outcome. The multiply adjusted relative risks (RRs) for breast cancer, relative to women with no proliferative disease, were 1.6 for proliferative disease without atypia (95% confidence interval [Cl], 1.0 to 2.5) and 3.7 for atypical hyperplasia (95% Cl, 2.1 to 6.8). Breast cancer risk was more strongly associated with atypical hyperplasia among premenopausal women (RR = 5.9; 95% Cl, 2.9 to 13.2) than postmenopausal women (RR = 2.3; 95% Cl, 0.9 to 5.9), but the association of breast cancer risk with proliferative disease without atypia did not differ across menopausal status. Conclusion. —These results confirm the marked increase in breast cancer risk among women with atypical hyperplasia, particularly in premenopausal women, and suggest that these women should be encouraged to undergo frequent breast cancer screening. (JAMA. 1992;267:941-944)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dietary fat and the risk of breast cancer.
Willett, W. C., Stampfer, M. J., Colditz, G. A., Rosner, B. A., Hennekens, C. H., & Speizer, F. E. (1987) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198701013160105 · Cited by 534
Cited by
Benign Breast Disease and the Risk of Breast Cancer
Hartmann, L. C., Sellers, T. A., Frost, M. H., Lingle, W. L., Degnim, A. C., Ghosh, K., Vierkant, R. A., Maloney, S. D., Pankratz, V. S., Hillman, D. W., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa044383 · Cited by 938
Diagnostic Concordance Among Pathologists Interpreting Breast Biopsy Specimens
Elmore, J. G., Longton, G. M., Carney, P. A., Geller, B. M., Onega, T., Tosteson, A. N. A., Nelson, H. D., Pepe, M. S., Allison, K. H., Schnitt, S. J., et al. (2015) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2015.1405 · Cited by 751
The Nurses׳ Health Study: lifestyle and health among women
Colditz, G. A., & Hankinson, S. E. (2005) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1608 · Cited by 590
Priorities for the primary prevention of breast cancer
Colditz, G. A., & Bohlke, K. (2014) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21225 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- London, S. J.
- Venue
- JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1992-02-19
- Volume
- 267
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 941
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W1965217852
- Cited by
- 504
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Prospective Study of Benign Breast Disease and the Risk of Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1992.03480070057030
- The paper
- London, S. J. (1992). A Prospective Study of Benign Breast Disease and the Risk of Breast Cancer. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03480070057030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.