Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 504

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Prospective Study of Benign Breast Disease and the Risk of Breast Cancer

London, Stephanie J.·1992·JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association

Abstract

Objective. —To examine the relation between proliferative benign breast disease with and without atypical hyperplasia and the subsequent risk of breast cancer. Design. —Case-control study nested within a prospective cohort study. Median follow-up after breast biopsy was 8 years (25th to 75th percentile, 5 to 14 years). Participants. —Selected from a prospective cohort of 121 700 US registered nurses followed up from 1976 to 1986. Cases were women with breast cancer who had a prior biopsy for benign breast disease. Controls were randomly selected and matched on year of biopsy and year of birth from among women in the cohort who had a benign breast biopsy but who did not develop breast cancer. Included in the analysis were 121 cases and 488 controls. Main Outcome Measure. —Development of breast cancer. Results. —Slides from the first benign breast biopsy were reviewed by two breast pathologists blinded to the outcome. The multiply adjusted relative risks (RRs) for breast cancer, relative to women with no proliferative disease, were 1.6 for proliferative disease without atypia (95% confidence interval [Cl], 1.0 to 2.5) and 3.7 for atypical hyperplasia (95% Cl, 2.1 to 6.8). Breast cancer risk was more strongly associated with atypical hyperplasia among premenopausal women (RR = 5.9; 95% Cl, 2.9 to 13.2) than postmenopausal women (RR = 2.3; 95% Cl, 0.9 to 5.9), but the association of breast cancer risk with proliferative disease without atypia did not differ across menopausal status. Conclusion. —These results confirm the marked increase in breast cancer risk among women with atypical hyperplasia, particularly in premenopausal women, and suggest that these women should be encouraged to undergo frequent breast cancer screening. (JAMA. 1992;267:941-944)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1992.03480070057030

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 504

Metadata

Authors
London, S. J.
Venue
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Published
1992-02-19
Volume
267
Issue
7
Pages
941
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W1965217852
Cited by
504
References
1
FWCI
15.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Prospective Study of Benign Breast Disease and the Risk of Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1992.03480070057030
The paper
London, S. J. (1992). A Prospective Study of Benign Breast Disease and the Risk of Breast Cancer. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03480070057030

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.