The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Longitudinal Evaluation of Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels in Men With and Without Prostate Disease
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate longitudinal changes in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in men with and without prostate disease. DESIGN: Case-control study of men with and without prostate disease who were participants in a prospective aging study. SETTING: Gerontology Research Center of the National Institute on Aging; the Baltimore (Md) Longitudinal Study of Aging. PATIENTS: Sixteen men with no prostate disease (control group), 20 men with a histologic diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and 18 men with a histologic diagnosis of prostate cancer. OUTCOME MEASURES: Multiple PSA and androgen determinations on serum samples obtained from 7 to 25 years prior to histologic diagnosis or exclusion of prostate disease. RESULTS: Changes in androgen levels with age did not differ between groups. Control subjects did not show a significant change in PSA levels with age. There was a significant difference in the age-adjusted rate of change in PSA levels between groups (prostate cancer greater than BPH greater than control; P less than .01). At 5 years before diagnosis when PSA levels did not differ between subjects with BPH and prostate cancer, rate of change in PSA levels (0.75 micrograms/L per year) was significantly greater in subjects with prostate cancer compared with control subjects and subjects with BPH. Also, rate of change in PSA levels distinguished subjects with prostate cancer from subjects with BPH and control subjects with a specificity of 90% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The most significant factor affecting serum PSA levels with age is the development of prostate disease. Rate of change in PSA levels may be a sensitive and specific early clinical marker for the development of prostate cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Risks of testosterone-replacement therapy and recommendations for monitoring.
Rhoden, E. L., & Morgentaler, A. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra022251 · Cited by 705
A contemporary approach to validity arguments: a practical guide to Kane's framework
Cook, D. A., Brydges, R., Ginsburg, S., & Hatala, R. (2015) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12678 · Cited by 554
Marks, L. S., Mazer, N. A., Mostaghel, E., Hess, D. L., Dorey, F. J., Epstein, J. I., Veltri, R. W., Makarov, D. V., Partin, A. W., Bostwick, D. G., et al. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.19.2351 · Cited by 400
Metadata
- Authors
- Carter, H. B.
- Venue
- JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1992-04-22
- Volume
- 267
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 2215
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2142072350
- Cited by
- 1,096
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 65.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Longitudinal Evaluation of Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels in Men With and Without Prostate Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1992.03480160073037
- The paper
- Carter, H. B. (1992). Longitudinal Evaluation of Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels in Men With and Without Prostate Disease. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03480160073037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.