The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rates of Avoidable Hospitalization by Insurance Status in Massachusetts and Maryland
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether uninsured and Medicaid patients have higher rates of avoidable hospitalizations than do insured patients. DESIGN: We used 1987 computerized hospital discharge data to select a cross-sectional sample of hospitalized patients. Population estimates from the Current Population Survey were used to estimate rates of admission, standardized for age and sex. SETTING: Nonfederal acute care hospitals in Massachusetts and Maryland. PATIENTS: All patients under 65 years of age who were uninsured, privately insured, or insured by Medicaid. Hospitalizations for obstetric and psychiatric conditions were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relative risk of admission for 12 avoidable hospital conditions (AHCs) identified by a physician panel. RESULTS: Uninsured and Medicaid patients were more likely than insured patients to be hospitalized for AHCs. Rates for uninsured patients were significantly greater than for privately insured patients in Massachusetts for 10 of 12 individual AHCs, and in Maryland for five of 12 AHCs. After adjustment for baseline utilization, the results were statistically significant for 10 of 12 AHCs in Massachusetts and seven of 12 AHCs in Maryland. For Medicaid patients, rates were significantly greater than for privately insured patients for all AHCs in each state before adjustment, and for nine of 12 and seven of 12 AHCs in each state, respectively, after adjustment for baseline utilization. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that patients who are uninsured or who have Medicaid coverage have higher rates of hospitalization for conditions that can often be treated out of hospital or avoided altogether. Our approach is potentially useful for routine monitoring of access and quality of care for selected groups of patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Management of Hyperglycemic Crises in Patients With Diabetes
Kitabchi, A. E., Umpierrez, G. E., Murphy, M. B., Barrett, E. J., Kreisberg, R. A., Malone, J. I., & Wall, B. M. (2001) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.24.1.131 · Cited by 710
Association of Incident Dementia With Hospitalizations
Phelan, E. A., Borson, S., Grothaus, L., Balch, S., & Larson, E. B. (2012) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1964 · Cited by 547
Health Insurance and Mortality in US Adults
Wilper, A. P., Woolhandler, S., Lasser, K. E., McCormick, D., Bor, D. H., & Himmelstein, D. U. (2009) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2008.157685 · Cited by 470
Potentially avoidable hospitalizations: inequalities in rates between US socioeconomic groups.
Pappas, G., Hadden, W. C., Kozak, L. J., & Fisher, G. F. (1997) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.87.5.811 · Cited by 396
Multiple hospitalizations for patients with diabetes
Jiang, H. J., Stryer, D., Friedman, B., & Andrews, R. (2003) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.26.5.1421 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Weissman, J. S.
- Venue
- JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1992-11-04
- Volume
- 268
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 2388
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2064538429
- Cited by
- 713
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 34.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rates of Avoidable Hospitalization by Insurance Status in Massachusetts and Maryland. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1992.03490170060026
- The paper
- Weissman, J. S. (1992). Rates of Avoidable Hospitalization by Insurance Status in Massachusetts and Maryland. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03490170060026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.