Cited by 261Chronic Disease Management StrategiesHealthcare Policy and ManagementDiabetes Management and Research

Multiple hospitalizations for patients with diabetes

Open access
Jiang, H. Joanna, Stryer, Daniel, Friedman, Bernard, Andrews, Roxanne·2003·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the extent to which hospitalizations for patients with diabetes reflect multiple stays by the same individuals and to examine how multiple hospitalizations vary by patient demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project complete discharge data for five states (California, Missouri, New York, Tennessee, and Virginia) in 1999, we identified 648,748 nonneonatal, nonmaternal patients who had one or more hospitalizations listing diabetes. Multiple hospitalizations were measured as percent of patients with multiple stays, percent of total stays represented by multiple stays, and average number of stays per patient. Total hospital costs were also examined. Stratified analysis and regression were performed to assess differences by age, sex, race/ethnicity, payer, location, and income. RESULTS: Among patients with diabetes who had been hospitalized, 30% had two or more stays accounting for >50% of total hospitalizations and hospital costs. Controlled for patient age, sex, and clinical characteristics, the likelihood of having multiple hospitalizations was higher for Hispanics and non-Hispanic blacks compared with non-Hispanic whites, as well as for patients covered by Medicare or Medicaid and those living in low-income areas. The prevalence of diabetes complications and multiple conditions differed by age, race/ethnicity, and payer among patients with multiple stays. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple hospitalizations are common among patients with diabetes but vary by age, race/ethnicity, payer, and income, with those populations traditionally considered to be more vulnerable experiencing higher likelihoods of multiple stays. Significant opportunities exist to reduce the proportion of multiple hospitalizations for patients with diabetes. Clinical and policy interventions to improve the quality of care and outcomes for these patients should be designed accordingly and have the potential to pay major dividends.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.26.5.1421

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of people with diabetes who are hospitalized, 30% have two or more days of hospital stays.

    “Of people with diabetes who are hospitalized, 30% have two or more days of hospital stays”

    From 16. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [191]

    The ‘Extent of multiple hospitalizations’ section reports that 30% of hospitalized patients with diabetes in five selected states in 1999 had two or more hospital stays. The claim changes ‘stays’ to ‘days of hospital stays’; the paper does not report that 30% had stays totaling two or more days. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Admissions of people with diabetes who are hospitalized account for over 50% of hospital costs for diabetes.

    “and these admissions account for over 50% of hospital costs for diabetes (191).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Institute of Medicine: Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC, National Acad- emy Press, 2002
  2. Institute of Medicine: Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 2002

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jiang, H. J., Stryer, D., Friedman, B., & Andrews, R.
Affiliations
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US)
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2003-05-01
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
1421-1426
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2003366444
Cited by
261
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
4.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, multiple hospitalizations, hospital readmission, hospital costs, racial and ethnic disparities, Hispanic patients, non-Hispanic Black patients, Medicare, Medicaid, low-income areas, diabetes complications, comorbidities, health care utilization
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Child, Preschool, Costs and Cost Analysis, Demography, Diabetes Mellitus, Ethnicity, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Infant, Inpatients, Male, Maryland, Middle Aged, Rural Population, Socioeconomic Factors, Urban Population, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review