The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neuropsychological Sequelae of Cardiac Arrest
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Prospective and community-based studies on the cognitive outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest have not been published. We studied prospectively the neuropsychological sequelae of cardiac arrest and evaluated the effects of nimodipine on them. DESIGN: Placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind trial of nimodipine compared with placebo in out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation. SETTING: Urban area of 500,000 inhabitants served by the physician-manned Advanced Life Support Unit of Helsinki. PATIENTS: A total of 155 successfully resuscitated consecutive patients out of 677 resuscitation attempts during 2 1/2 years. Sixty-eight survivors were examined by a neuropsychologist and a neurologist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Neuropsychological outcome 3 months and 1 year after cardiac arrest. INTERVENTIONS: Nimodipine or placebo at a dosage of 10 micrograms/kg as an intravenous injection immediately after restoration of spontaneous circulation, followed by an infusion of 0.5 micrograms/kg per minute for 24 hours. RESULTS: Three months after cardiac arrest, 41 (60%) of 68 patients were found to have moderate to severe cognitive deficits. At 12 months, 26 (48%) of 54 survivors still had moderate to severe deficits, and the Symptom Check List 90--Revised score indicated the presence of depression in 22 patients (45%) and severe depression in 12 patients (24%). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate to severe neuropsychological sequelae of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest are still present in approximately one half of the survivors at 1 year and may be permanent. There seems to be no excess of increased disability in the subgroup of patients with delayed advanced life support. Nimodipine failed to show any effect on the cognitive functions tested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The mean IQ of Americans: Massive gains 1932 to 1978.
Flynn, J. R. (1984) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.95.1.29 · Cited by 1,206
LAPLANE, D., LEVASSEUR, M., PILLON, B., DUBOIS, B., BAULAC, M., MAZOYER, B., DINH, S. T., SETTE, G., DANZE, F., & BARON, J. C. (1989) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/112.3.699 · Cited by 415
Cited by
Nishiyama, C., Brown, S. P., May, S., Iwami, T., Koster, R. W., Beesems, S. G., Kuisma, M., Salo, A., Jacobs, I., Finn, J., et al. (2014) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.06.031 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Roine, R. O.
- Venue
- JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1993-01-13
- Volume
- 269
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 237
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2062743674
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.