Cited by 1,206Cognitive Abilities and TestingPsychometric Methodologies and TestingIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

The mean IQ of Americans: Massive gains 1932 to 1978.

Flynn, James R.·1984·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

This study shows that every Stanford-Binet and Wechsler standardization sample from 1932 to 1978 established norms of a higher standard than its predecessor. The obvious interpretation of this pattern is that representative samples of Americans did better and better on IQ tests over a period of 46 years, the total gain amounting to a rise in mean IQ of 13.8 points. The implications of this finding are developed: The combination of IQ gains and the decline in Scholastic Aptitude Test scores seems almost inexplicable; obsolete norms have acted as an unrecognized confounding variable in hundreds of studies; and IQ gains of this magnitude pose a serious problem of causal explanation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.95.1.29

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flynn, J. R.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Flynn, James R.
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
1984-01
Volume
95
Issue
1
Pages
29-51
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2037951270
Cited by
1,206
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 41
FWCI
33.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
IQ gains, Stanford-Binet, Wechsler intelligence tests, standardization sample, confounding variables, causal explanation, intelligence trends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review