The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gallstones and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Abstract
The National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on Gallstones and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy brought together surgeons, endoscopists, hepatologists, gastroenterologists, internists, radiologists, and epidemiologists as well as other health care professionals and the public to address (1) the indications for treatment of patients with gallstones; (2) the role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in treating patients with gallstones; (3) the role of alternative medical and surgical treatments for gallstones; (4) the comparative results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with open cholecystectomy and other available treatments; (5) techniques for detecting and treating bile duct stones with or without laparoscopic cholecystectomy; and (6) future directions for research in prevention and management of gallstone disease and in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Following 2 days of presentations by experts and extensive discussion by the audience, a consensus panel weighed the evidence and prepared their consensus statement. Among their findings, the panel concluded that (1) most patients who experience symptoms of gallstones should be treated; (2) in comparison with open cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy provides a safe and effective treatment for most patients with symptomatic gallstones and has become the treatment of choice for many patients; (3) patients who are not good candidates for laparoscopic cholecystectomy include those with generalized peritonitis, septic shock from cholangitis, severe acute pancreatitis, endstage cirrhosis, and gallbladder cancer; (4) laparoscopic cholecystectomy decreases pain and disability without increasing mortality and morbidity and can be performed at an equal or lower cost than open cholecystectomy; and (5) every effort should be made to ensure that surgeons performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy are properly trained and credentialed. The full text of the consensus panel's statement follows.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis
Keus, F., de Jong, J., Gooszen, H. G., & Laarhoven, C. J. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006231 · Cited by 616
Increased Cholecystectomy Rate After the Introduction of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Legorreta, A. P. (1993) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03510120051029 · Cited by 344
Port-access coronary artery bypass grafting: A proposed surgical method
Stevens, J. H., Burdon, T. A., Peters, W. S., Siegel, L. C., Pompili, M. F., Vierra, M. A., St. Goar, F. G., Ribakove, G. H., Mitchell, R. S., & Reitz, B. A. (1996) · The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0022-5223(96)70308-2 · Cited by 277
Infective complications in laparoscopic surgery
Boni, L., Benevento, A., Rovera, F., Dionigi, G., Giuseppe, M. D., Bertoglio, C., & Dionigi, R. (2006) · Surgical Infections · doi:10.1089/sur.2006.7.s2-109 · Cited by 125
Gurusamy, K. S., Vaughan, J., Toon, C. D., & Davidson, B. R. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008261.pub2 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Gollan, J. L.
- Venue
- JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1993-02-24
- Volume
- 269
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1018
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2152078072
- Cited by
- 525
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gallstones and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1993.03500080066034
- The paper
- Gollan, J. L. (1993). Gallstones and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1993.03500080066034
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.